Literature DB >> 21791225

Inter-model consistency and complementarity: learning from ex-vivo imaging and electrophysiological data towards an integrated understanding of cardiac physiology.

O Camara1, M Sermesant, P Lamata, L Wang, M Pop, J Relan, M De Craene, H Delingette, H Liu, S Niederer, A Pashaei, G Plank, D Romero, R Sebastian, K C L Wong, H Zhang, N Ayache, A F Frangi, P Shi, N P Smith, G A Wright.   

Abstract

Computational models of the heart at various scales and levels of complexity have been independently developed, parameterised and validated using a wide range of experimental data for over four decades. However, despite remarkable progress, the lack of coordinated efforts to compare and combine these computational models has limited their impact on the numerous open questions in cardiac physiology. To address this issue, a comprehensive dataset has previously been made available to the community that contains the cardiac anatomy and fibre orientations from magnetic resonance imaging as well as epicardial transmembrane potentials from optical mapping measured on a perfused ex-vivo porcine heart. This data was used to develop and customize four models of cardiac electrophysiology with different level of details, including a personalized fast conduction Purkinje system, a maximum a posteriori estimation of the 3D distribution of transmembrane potential, the personalization of a simplified reaction-diffusion model, and a detailed biophysical model with generic conduction parameters. This study proposes the integration of these four models into a single modelling and simulation pipeline, after analyzing their common features and discrepancies. The proposed integrated pipeline demonstrates an increase prediction power of depolarization isochrones in different pacing conditions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791225     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  9 in total

Review 1.  Optical mapping in the developing zebrafish heart.

Authors:  M Khaled Sabeh; Hussein Kekhia; Calum A Macrae
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of substrate mapping: an in silico framework for the evaluation of electroanatomical substrate mapping strategies.

Authors:  Joshua J E Blauer; Darrell Swenson; Koji Higuchi; Gernot Plank; Ravi Ranjan; Nassir Marrouche; Rob S Macleod
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-05-30

Review 3.  Understanding the mechanisms amenable to CRT response: from pre-operative multimodal image data to patient-specific computational models.

Authors:  C Tobon-Gomez; N Duchateau; R Sebastian; S Marchesseau; O Camara; E Donal; M De Craene; A Pashaei; J Relan; M Steghofer; P Lamata; H Delingette; S Duckett; M Garreau; A Hernandez; K S Rhode; M Sermesant; N Ayache; C Leclercq; R Razavi; N P Smith; A F Frangi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Improving cardiomyocyte model fidelity and utility via dynamic electrophysiology protocols and optimization algorithms.

Authors:  Trine Krogh-Madsen; Eric A Sobie; David J Christini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Data integration for the numerical simulation of cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors:  Stefano Pagani; Luca Dede'; Andrea Manzoni; Alfio Quarteroni
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications.

Authors:  Alejandro Lopez-Perez; Rafael Sebastian; Jose M Ferrero
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  FieldML, a proposed open standard for the Physiome project for mathematical model representation.

Authors:  Randall D Britten; G Richard Christie; Caton Little; Andrew K Miller; Chris Bradley; Alan Wu; Tommy Yu; Peter Hunter; Poul Nielsen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  Images as drivers of progress in cardiac computational modelling.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Ramón Casero; Valentina Carapella; Steve A Niederer; Martin J Bishop; Jürgen E Schneider; Peter Kohl; Vicente Grau
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Automated Framework for the Inclusion of a His-Purkinje System in Cardiac Digital Twins of Ventricular Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Karli Gillette; Matthias A F Gsell; Julien Bouyssier; Anton J Prassl; Aurel Neic; Edward J Vigmond; Gernot Plank
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.934

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.