Literature DB >> 21790589

Assessment of a novel hybrid Delphi and Nominal Groups technique to evaluate quality indicators.

Sheryl Davies1, Patrick S Romano, Eric M Schmidt, Ellen Schultz, Jeffrey J Geppert, Kathryn M McDonald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the implementation of a novel structured panel process in the evaluation of quality indicators. DATA SOURCE: National panel of 64 clinicians rating usefulness of indicator applications in 2008-2009. STUDY
DESIGN: Hybrid panel combined Delphi Group and Nominal Group (NG) techniques to evaluate 81 indicator applications. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The Delphi Group and NG rated 56 percent of indicator applications similarly. Group assignment (Delphi versus Nominal) was not significantly associated with mean ratings, but specialty and research interests of panelists, and indicator factors such as denominator level and proposed use were. Rating distributions narrowed significantly in 20.8 percent of applications between review rounds.
CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid panel process facilitated information exchange and tightened rating distributions. Future assessments of this method might include a control panel. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21790589      PMCID： PMC3393032          DOI： 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01297.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN： 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  Reproducibility of measures of overuse of cataract surgery by three physician panels.

Authors:  J K Tobacman; I U Scott; S Cyphert; B Zimmerman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: a method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics.

Authors:  A D Brown; M J Goldacre; N Hicks; J T Rourke; R Y McMurtry; J D Brown; G M Anderson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  Reliability of clinical guideline development using mail-only versus in-person expert panels.

Authors:  Donna L Washington; Steven J Bernstein; James P Kahan; Lucian L Leape; Caren J Kamberg; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; Colin Sanderson; Nick Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-17

5.  A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes.

Authors:  Umesh T Kadam; Kelvin Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Development of measures of the quality of emergency department care for children using a structured panel process.

Authors:  Astrid Guttmann; Asma Razzaq; Patty Lindsay; Brandon Zagorski; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  A new approach for measuring quality of care for women with hypertension.

Authors:  S M Asch; E A Kerr; P Lapuerta; A Law; E A McGlynn
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-05-28

Review 8.  Quality-of-care indicators for the neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process.

Authors:  C Jason Wang; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Robert H Brook; Carol H Leonard; Robert E Piecuch; Steven I Hsueh; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?

Authors:  S M Campbell; T Shield; A Rogers; L Gask
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

10.  Brief communication: National quality-of-care standards in home-based primary care.

Authors:  Kristofer L Smith; Theresa A Soriano; Jeremy Boal
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 25.391
View more
  10 in total

1.  Selection of hospital antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators: a consensus among German antibiotic stewardship (ABS) networkers.

Authors:  J Thern; K de With; R Strauss; M Steib-Bauert; N Weber; W V Kern
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Development and Validation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Measures of Potentially Preventable Emergency Department (ED) Visits: The ED Prevention Quality Indicators for General Health Conditions.

Authors:  Sheryl Davies; Ellen Schultz; Maria Raven; Nancy Ewen Wang; Carol L Stocks; Mucio Kit Delgado; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Composition of a vision screen for servicemembers with traumatic brain injury: consensus using a modified nominal group technique.

Authors:  Mary Vining Radomski; Marsha Finkelstein; Imelda Llanos; Mitchell Scheiman; Sharon Gowdy Wagener
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

4.  Defining outcome measures of hospitalization for assessment in the Japanese forensic mental health scheme: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Akihiro Shiina; Masaomi Iyo; Yoshito Igarashi
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  Using a collaborative research approach to develop an interdisciplinary research agenda for the study of mobile health interventions for older adults.

Authors:  Kathryn Mercer; Neill Baskerville; Catherine M Burns; Feng Chang; Lora Giangregorio; Jill Tomasson Goodwin; Leila Sadat Rezai; Kelly Grindrod
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  The management of children with bronchiolitis in the Australasian hospital setting: development of a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Sharon O'Brien; Sally Wilson; Fenella J Gill; Elizabeth Cotterell; Meredith L Borland; Edward Oakley; Stuart R Dalziel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Development of the ASSESS tool: a comprehenSive tool to Support rEporting and critical appraiSal of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods implementation reSearch outcomes.

Authors:  Nessa Ryan; Dorice Vieira; Joyce Gyamfi; Temitope Ojo; Donna Shelley; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Juliet Iwelunmor; Emmanuel Peprah
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-03-28

8.  Searching for consensus among physicians involved in the management of sick-listed workers in the Belgian health care sector: a qualitative study among practitioners and stakeholders.

Authors:  Marc Vanmeerbeek; Patrick Govers; Nathalie Schippers; Stéphane Rieppi; Katrien Mortelmans; Philippe Mairiaux
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Evaluation of a nursing and midwifery exchange between rural and metropolitan hospitals: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Amy-Louise Byrne; Clare Harvey; Diane Chamberlain; Adele Baldwin; Brody Heritage; Elspeth Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Models of maternal and child healthcare for African refugees: protocol for an exploratory, mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Carolyne Njue; Andrew Hayen; Angela J Dawson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.