BACKGROUND: Appropriate and timely provision of ambulatory care is an important factor in maintaining population health and in avoiding unneccessary hospital use. This article describes conditions for which hospitalization rates have a strong and inverse relationship to access to high-quality ambulatory care. METHODS: Three panels of Canadian physicians following different consensus techniques selected conditions for which the relative risk of hospitalization is inversely related to ambulatory care access. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: All panels identified asthma, angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, otitis media, gastric ulcer, pelvic inflammatory disease, malignant hypertension, and immunization-preventable infections as ambulatory care-sensitive admissions. These conditions strongly overlap with lists developed for similar purposes in the U.S. and England. INTERPRETATION: Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions represent an intermediate health outcome. They are distinct from inappropriate hospitalizations. They may be useful for measuring the impact of health care policy, and for performance measurement or audit.
BACKGROUND: Appropriate and timely provision of ambulatory care is an important factor in maintaining population health and in avoiding unneccessary hospital use. This article describes conditions for which hospitalization rates have a strong and inverse relationship to access to high-quality ambulatory care. METHODS: Three panels of Canadian physicians following different consensus techniques selected conditions for which the relative risk of hospitalization is inversely related to ambulatory care access. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: All panels identified asthma, angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, otitis media, gastric ulcer, pelvic inflammatory disease, malignant hypertension, and immunization-preventable infections as ambulatory care-sensitive admissions. These conditions strongly overlap with lists developed for similar purposes in the U.S. and England. INTERPRETATION: Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions represent an intermediate health outcome. They are distinct from inappropriate hospitalizations. They may be useful for measuring the impact of health care policy, and for performance measurement or audit.
Authors: D Bild; L S Geiss; S M Teutsch; B Gabella; B A Hudspeth; R M Schubert; C W Gollmar; D J Kaplan; F A Connell; J C Will Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1988 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Ryan Ng; Claire E Kendall; Ann N Burchell; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Mona R Loutfy; Janet Raboud; Richard H Glazier; Sean Rourke; Tony Antoniou Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2016-05-25
Authors: Adeline Vanderver; Morgan Prust; Davide Tonduti; Fanny Mochel; Heather M Hussey; Guy Helman; James Garbern; Florian Eichler; Pierre Labauge; Patrick Aubourg; Diana Rodriguez; Marc C Patterson; Johan L K Van Hove; Johanna Schmidt; Nicole I Wolf; Odile Boespflug-Tanguy; Raphael Schiffmann; Marjo S van der Knaap Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Sheryl Davies; Patrick S Romano; Eric M Schmidt; Ellen Schultz; Jeffrey J Geppert; Kathryn M McDonald Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Song Gao; Braden J Manns; Bruce F Culleton; Marcello Tonelli; Hude Quan; Lynden Crowshoe; William A Ghali; Lawrence W Svenson; Sofia Ahmed; Brenda R Hemmelgarn Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Monica C Robotin; Sandra C Jones; Andrew V Biankin; Louise Waters; Don Iverson; Helen Gooden; Bruce Barraclough; Andrew G Penman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 2.506