Literature DB >> 21787938

Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows.

S M van Zijderveld1, W J J Gerrits, J Dijkstra, J R Newbold, R B A Hulshof, H B Perdok.   

Abstract

Feeding nitrate to dairy cows may lower ruminal methane production by competing for reducing equivalents with methanogenesis. Twenty lactating Holstein-Friesian dairy cows (33.2±6.0 kg of milk/d; 104±58 d in milk at the start of the experiment) were fed a total mixed ration (corn silage-based; forage to concentrate ratio 66:34), containing either a dietary urea or a dietary nitrate source [21 g of nitrate/kg of dry matter (DM)] during 4 successive 24-d periods, to assess the methane-mitigating potential of dietary nitrate and its persistency. The study was conducted as paired comparisons in a randomized design with repeated measurements. Cows were blocked by parity, lactation stage, and milk production at the start of the experiment. A 4-wk adaptation period allowed the rumen microbes to adapt to dietary urea and nitrate. Diets were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous. Methane production, energy balance, and diet digestibility were measured in open-circuit indirect calorimetry chambers. Cows were limit-fed during measurements. Nitrate persistently decreased methane production by 16%, whether expressed in grams per day, grams per kilogram of dry matter intake (DMI), or as percentage of gross energy intake, which was sustained for the full experimental period (mean 368 vs. 310±12.5 g/d; 19.4 vs. 16.2±0.47 g/kg of DMI; 5.9 vs.4.9±0.15% of gross energy intake for urea vs. nitrate, respectively). This decrease was smaller than the stoichiometrical methane mitigation potential of nitrate (full potential=28% methane reduction). The decreased energy loss from methane resulted in an improved conversion of dietary energy intake into metabolizable energy (57.3 vs. 58.6±0.70%, urea vs. nitrate, respectively). Despite this, milk energy output or energy retention was not affected by dietary nitrate. Nitrate did not affect milk yield or apparent digestibility of crude fat, neutral detergent fiber, and starch. Milk protein content (3.21 vs. 3.05±0.058%, urea vs. nitrate respectively) but not protein yield was lower for dietary nitrate. Hydrogen production between morning and afternoon milking was measured during the last experimental period. Cows fed nitrate emitted more hydrogen. Cows fed nitrate displayed higher blood methemoglobin levels (0.5 vs. 4.0±1.07% of hemoglobin, urea vs. nitrate respectively) and lower hemoglobin levels (7.1 vs. 6.3±0.11 mmol/L, urea vs. nitrate respectively). Dietary nitrate persistently decreased methane production from lactating dairy cows fed restricted amounts of feed, but the reduction in energy losses did not improve milk production or energy balance.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21787938     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  27 in total

1.  Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium ammonium nitrate on ruminal fermentation of beef cattle.

Authors:  Darren D Henry; Francine M Ciriaco; Rafael C Araujo; Pedro L P Fontes; Nicola Oosthuizen; Sebastian E Mejia-Turcios; Mariana E Garcia-Ascolani; Lautaro Rostoll-Cangiano; Tessa M Schulmeister; Jose C B Dubeux; G Cliff Lamb; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effect of nitrate and monensin on in vitro ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  M Capelari; W Powers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The effect of encapsulated nitrate and monensin on ruminal fermentation using a semi-continuous culture system.

Authors:  Matheus Capelari; Kristen A Johnson; Brooke Latack; Jolene Roth; Wendy Powers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Characterization and mitigation option of greenhouse gas emissions from lactating Holstein dairy cows in East China.

Authors:  Peng Jia; Yan Tu; Zhihao Liu; Qi Lai; Fadi Li; Lifeng Dong; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-30

5.  Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on enteric methane production, nutrient digestibility, and liver mineral concentration of beef cattle.

Authors:  Darren D Henry; Francine M Ciriaco; Rafael C Araujo; Pedro L P Fontes; Nicola Oosthuizen; Lautaro Rostoll-Cangiano; Carla D Sanford; Tessa M Schulmeister; Jose C B Dubeux; Graham Cliff Lamb; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed.

Authors:  Dieter Schrenk; Margherita Bignami; Laurent Bodin; James Kevin Chipman; Jesús Del Mazo; Bettina Grasl-Kraupp; Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom; Jean-Charles Leblanc; Carlo Stefano Nebbia; Elsa Nielsen; Evangelia Ntzani; Annette Petersen; Salomon Sand; Tanja Schwerdtle; Christiane Vleminckx; Heather Wallace; Vasileios Bampidis; Bruce Cottrill; Maria Jose Frutos; Peter Furst; Anthony Parker; Marco Binaglia; Anna Christodoulidou; Petra Gergelova; Irene Munoz Guajardo; Carina Wenger; Christer Hogstrand
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2020-11-04

7.  Shifts in metabolic hydrogen sinks in the methanogenesis-inhibited ruminal fermentation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilio M Ungerfeld
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Measurement and Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-20

9.  Effects of Rumen Protozoa of Brahman Heifers and Nitrate on Fermentation and In vitro Methane Production.

Authors:  S H Nguyen; L Li; R S Hegarty
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Does Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Production Affect Rumen Function and Animal Productivity in Dairy Cows?

Authors:  Jolien B Veneman; Stefan Muetzel; Kenton J Hart; Catherine L Faulkner; Jon M Moorby; Hink B Perdok; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.