Literature DB >> 21786182

Realizing the potential of ecosystem services: a framework for relating ecological changes to economic benefits.

Lisa Wainger1, Marisa Mazzotta.   

Abstract

Increasingly government agencies are seeking to quantify the outcomes of proposed policy options in terms of ecosystem service benefits, yet conflicting definitions and ad hoc approaches to measuring ecosystem services have created confusion regarding how to rigorously link ecological change to changes in human well-being. Here, we describe a step-by-step framework for producing ecological models and metrics that can effectively serve an economic-benefits assessment of a proposed change in policy or management. A focus of the framework is developing comparable units of ecosystem goods and services to support decision-making, even if outcomes cannot be monetized. Because the challenges to translating ecological changes to outcomes appropriate for economic analyses are many, we discuss examples that demonstrate practical methods and approaches to overcoming data limitations. The numerous difficult decisions that government agencies must make to fairly use and allocate natural resources provides ample opportunity for interdisciplinary teams of natural and social scientists to improve methods for quantifying changes in ecosystem services and their effects on human well-being. This framework is offered with the intent of promoting the success of such teams as they support managers in evaluating the equivalency of ecosystem service offsets and trades, establishing restoration and preservation priorities, and more generally, in developing environmental policy that effectively balances multiple perspectives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21786182     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9726-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  21 in total

1.  Testing the basic assumption of the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions.

Authors:  T Hruby
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Translational ecology.

Authors:  William H Schlesinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ecology. Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs.

Authors:  Stephen R Carpenter; Ruth DeFries; Thomas Dietz; Harold A Mooney; Stephen Polasky; Walter V Reid; Robert J Scholes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cooperative modeling: linking science, communication, and ground water planning.

Authors:  Vincent C Tidwell; Cors van den Brink
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  An index of risk as a measure of biodiversity conservation achieved through land reform.

Authors:  Susan Walker; Robbie Price; R T Theo Stephens
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values.

Authors:  Edward B Barbier; Evamaria W Koch; Brian R Silliman; Sally D Hacker; Eric Wolanski; Jurgenne Primavera; Elise F Granek; Stephen Polasky; Shankar Aswani; Lori A Cramer; David M Stoms; Chris J Kennedy; David Bael; Carrie V Kappel; Gerardo M E Perillo; Denise J Reed
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Rapid assessment of urban wetlands: do hydrogeomorphic classification and reference criteria work?

Authors:  Emilie K Stander; Joan G Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Characteristics of important stopover locations for migrating birds: remote sensing with radar in the Great Lakes basin.

Authors:  David N Bonter; Sidney A Gauthreaux; Therese M Donovan
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 6.560

9.  Expert judgment assessment of the mortality impact of changes in ambient fine particulate matter in the U.S.

Authors:  Henry A Roman; Katherine D Walker; Tyra L Walsh; Lisa Conner; Harvey M Richmond; Bryan J Hubbell; Patrick L Kinney
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation.

Authors:  Robin Naidoo; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  11 in total

1.  A resilience framework for chronic exposures: water quality and ecosystem services in coastal social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Nathaniel H Merrill; Kate K Mulvaney; David M Martin; Marnita M Chintala; Walter Berry; Timothy Gleason; Stephen Balogh; Austin Humphries
Journal:  Coast Manage       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.922

Review 2.  Impacts of Soil and Water Conservation Practices on Crop Yield, Run-off, Soil Loss and Nutrient Loss in Ethiopia: Review and Synthesis.

Authors:  Zenebe Adimassu; Simon Langan; Robyn Johnston; Wolde Mekuria; Tilahun Amede
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services.

Authors:  Randall Jf Bruins; Timothy J Canfield; Clifford Duke; Larry Kapustka; Amanda M Nahlik; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Rivers and streams in the media: a content analysis of ecosystem services.

Authors:  Matthew A Weber; Shannon Caplan; Paul Ringold; Karen Blocksom
Journal:  Ecol Soc       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.403

Review 5.  Review on Invasive Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle) Conflicting Values: Assessment of Its Ecosystem Services and Potential Biological Threat.

Authors:  Barbara Sladonja; Marta Sušek; Julia Guillermic
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Combining ecosystem services assessment with structured decision making to support ecological restoration planning.

Authors:  David M Martin; Marisa Mazzotta; Justin Bousquin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.644

7.  Drought-induced changes in flow regimes lead to long-term losses in mussel-provided ecosystem services.

Authors:  Caryn C Vaughn; Carla L Atkinson; Jason P Julian
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Ecosystem Service Valuation Assessments for Protected Area Management: A Case Study Comparing Methods Using Different Land Cover Classification and Valuation Approaches.

Authors:  Charlotte E L Whitham; Kun Shi; Philip Riordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evidence-based economic analysis demonstrates that ecosystem service benefits of water hyacinth management greatly exceed research and control costs.

Authors:  Lisa A Wainger; Nathan E Harms; Cedric Magen; Dong Liang; Genevieve M Nesslage; Anna M McMurray; Al F Cofrancesco
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions.

Authors:  D M Martin; M Mazzotta
Journal:  Ecosyst Serv       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.