Literature DB >> 21786086

Forced confabulation affects memory sensitivity as well as response bias.

Victor Gombos1, Kathy Pezdek, Kelly Haymond.   

Abstract

A signal detection analysis assessed the extent to which forced confabulation results from a change in memory sensitivity (d(a)), as well as response criterion (β). After viewing a crime video, participants answered 14 answerable and 6 unanswerable questions. Those in the voluntary guess condition had a "don't know" response option; those in the forced guess condition did not. One week later, the same questions were answered using a recognition memory test that included each participant's initial responses. As was predicted, on both answerable and unanswerable questions, participants in the forced guess condition had significantly lower response criteria than did those who voluntarily guessed. Furthermore, on both answerable and unanswerable questions, d(a) scores were also significantly lower in the forced than in the voluntary guess condition. Thus, the forced confabulation effect is a real memory effect above and beyond the effects of response bias; forcing eyewitnesses to guess or speculate can actually change their memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21786086     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0129-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  Interviewing witnesses: forced confabulation and confirmatory feedback increase false memories.

Authors:  M S Zaragoza; K E Payment; J K Ackil; S B Drivdahl; M Beck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  Eyewitness testimony.

Authors:  Gary L Wells; Elizabeth A Olson
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Interviewing witnesses: the effect of forced confabulation on event memory.

Authors:  Kathy Pezdek; Kathryn Sperry; Shana M Owens
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2007-01-24

4.  Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Michael E J Masson; Michael F Verde
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

5.  The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy.

Authors:  T Hinz; K Pezdek
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2001-04

6.  "What else could he have done?" Creating false answers in child witnesses by inviting speculation.

Authors:  N Schreiber; D Wentura; W Bilsky
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2001-06

7.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.

Authors:  E F Loftus; D G Miller; H J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1978-01

8.  Memorial consequences of forced confabulation: age differences in susceptibility to false memories.

Authors:  J K Ackil; M S Zaragoza
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1998-11
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Impact of Emotion and Sex on Fabrication and False Memory Formation.

Authors:  Kamilla Run Johannsdottir; Halldora Bjorg Rafnsdottir; Andri Haukstein Oddsson; Haukur Freyr Gylfason
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Research on the Effects of Lying on Memory: A Scientometric Analysis and a Call for New Studies.

Authors:  Fabiana Battista; Henry Otgaar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.