Literature DB >> 18372758

Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures.

Caren M Rotello1, Michael E J Masson, Michael F Verde.   

Abstract

Experiments often produce a hit rate and a false alarm rate in each of two conditions. These response rates are summarized into a single-point sensitivity measure such as d', and t tests are conducted to test for experimental effects. Using large-scale Monte Carlo simulations, we evaluate the Type I error rates and power that result from four commonly used single-point measures: d', A', percent correct, and gamma. We also test a newly proposed measure called gammaC. For all measures, we consider several ways of handling cases in which false alarm rate = 0 or hit rate = 1. The results of our simulations indicate that power is similar for these measures but that the Type I error rates are often unacceptably high. Type I errors are minimized when the selected sensitivity measure is theoretically appropriate for the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18372758     DOI: 10.3758/pp.70.2.389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  Retrieval-induced forgetting in young children.

Authors:  Alp Aslan; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  When more data steer us wrong: replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Evan Heit; Chad Dubé
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

3.  Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.

Authors:  Michaela Rohr; Johannes Tröger; Nils Michely; Alarith Uhde; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

4.  Dissociating early- and late-selection processes in recall: the mixed blessing of categorized study lists.

Authors:  Mehmet A Guzel; Philip A Higham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

5.  Positive and negative remember judgments and ROCs in the plurals paradigm: evidence for alternative decision strategies.

Authors:  Aycan Kapucu; Neil A Macmillan; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

6.  Forced confabulation affects memory sensitivity as well as response bias.

Authors:  Victor Gombos; Kathy Pezdek; Kelly Haymond
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

7.  Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Sanghoon Han; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

8.  Beyond ROC curvature: Strength effects and response time data support continuous-evidence models of recognition memory.

Authors:  Chad Dube; Jeffrey J Starns; Caren M Rotello; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: complexity, mimicry, and discriminability.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

10.  Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception.

Authors:  Li Yan McCurdy; Brian Maniscalco; Janet Metcalfe; Ka Yuet Liu; Floris P de Lange; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.