| Literature DB >> 21785748 |
Hee Jung Ahn1, Kyung Ah Han, Jin Young Jang, Jae Hyuk Lee, Kang Seo Park, Kyung Wan Min.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Koreans eat rice, which is usually served in a rice bowl. We investigated the effect of a meal plan using small rice bowls on the total energy intake (TEI) and the marcronutrient intake in Korean men with type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Carbohydrate-restrict; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Diabetic diet; Men
Year: 2011 PMID: 21785748 PMCID: PMC3138099 DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2011.35.3.273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab J ISSN: 2233-6079 Impact factor: 5.376
Baseline clinical and metabolic characteristics of study subjects
The values are presented as mean±standard deviation or frequency (%). P value was calculated from one-way ANOVA test or chi-squared test.
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Change in dietary total energy intake, macronutrient composition by BMI
The values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Recommended TEI is obtained by multiplying 30 kcal per ideal body weight. Percent of ideal body weight is body weight (kg)/ideal body weight (kg)×100. The P values are for comparison of the 3 groups by one-way ANOVA test.
BMI, body mass index; NW, normal weight (<23 kg/m2); OW, overweight (≥23 kg/m2 and <25 kg/m2); OB, obese (≥25 kg/m2); TEI, total energy intake; PIBW, percent of ideal body weight.
aP<0.05 vs. NW, bP<0.05 vs. OW, cThe P values are for comparison of the 3 groups by Kruskal-Wallis test.
Fig. 1Change in total energy intake (% of recommended TEI) (A), carbohydrate intake (% of TEI) (B), protein intake (% of TEI) (C), and fat intake (% of TEI) (D) according to body mass index after 2 weeks of bowl based education in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. NW, normal weight (<23 kg/m2); OW, overweight (≥23 kg/m2 and <25 kg/m2); OB, obese (≥25 kg/m2); TEI, total energy intake. aP values<0.05 vs. Baseline, bP values<0.05 vs. NW.
Change in dietary total energy intake, macronutrient composition by carbohydrate intake
The values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Recommended TEI is obtained by multiplying 30 kcal per ideal body weight. Percent of ideal body weight is body weight (kg)/ideal body weight (kg)×100. The P values are for comparison of the 3 groups by one-way ANOVA test.
LC, low carbohydrate intake (<55%); RC, recommended carbohydrate intake (≥55% and ≤60%); HC, high carbohydrate intake (>60%); TEI, total energy intake; PIBW, percent of ideal body weight.
aP<0.05 vs. LC, bP<0.05 vs. RC, cThe P values are for comparison of the 3 groups by Kruskal-Wallis test.
Fig. 2Change in total energy intake (% of recommended TEI) (A), carbohydrate intake (% of TEI) (B), protein intake (% of TEI) (C), and fat intake (% of TEI) (D) according to proportions of carbohydrate intake after 2 weeks of bowl based education in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. LC, low carbohydrate intake (<55%); RC, recommended carbohydrate intake (≥55% and ≤60%); HC, high carbohydrate intake (>60%); TEI, total energy intake. aP values<0.05 vs. Baseline, bP values<0.05 vs. LC, cP values<0.05 vs. RC.