Literature DB >> 21785352

Evolving techniques in colonoscopy.

Krishna C Vemulapalli1, Douglas K Rex.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent clinical studies of colonoscopy technique and new technologies. RECENT
FINDINGS: Water immersion reduces pain and sedation doses in unsedated and lightly sedated colonoscopy. Cap-fitted colonoscopy makes insertion faster and improves detection of lesions behind folds, but the latter effect is operator-dependent. A single controlled trial showed improved detection with the Third Eye Retroscope, but the two arms of the study were not controlled for withdrawal time. Chromoendoscopy increases detection of diminutive adenomas, but adds time to the colonoscopy procedure. Electronic chromoendoscopy methods (narrow band imaging, Fujinon Intelligent ChromoEndoscopy, i-scan, and autofluorescence) have been either unsuccessful in improving detection or require more study. However, these methods and several other methods (chromoendoscopy with magnification, confocal laser microscopy, and endocytoscopy) allow accurate real time determination of polyp histology.
SUMMARY: Water immersion is a clear advance in unsedated colonoscopy. Cap-fitted colonoscopy is a promising method for both practical and effective visualization of the proximal sides of haustral folds. Electronic chromoendoscopy has been largely ineffective at improving polyp detection, but is effective (as are confocal laser microscopy and endocytoscopy) for diagnosis of polyp histology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21785352     DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328349cfc0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0267-1379            Impact factor:   3.287


  7 in total

Review 1.  Quality monitoring in colonoscopy: Time to act.

Authors:  Mary A Atia; Francisco C Ramirez; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 2.  Current state of micro-robots/devices as substitutes for screening colonoscopy: assessment based on technology readiness levels.

Authors:  Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Stuart Coleman; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  In vivo targeting of colonic dysplasia on fluorescence endoscopy with near-infrared octapeptide.

Authors:  Zhongyao Liu; Sharon J Miller; Bishnu P Joshi; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Benefits and limitations of cap-fitted colonoscopy in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Naoyuki Kato; Yasuyuki Ichise; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using high-definition i-scan: an educational experience.

Authors:  Mariëlle W E Bouwens; Rogier de Ridder; Ad A M Masclee; Ann Driessen; Robert G Riedl; Bjorn Winkens; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Endoscopists with low adenoma detection rates benefit from high-definition endoscopy.

Authors:  Elisabeth Waldmann; Martha Britto-Arias; Irina Gessl; Georg Heinze; Petra Salzl; Daniela Sallinger; Michael Trauner; Werner Weiss; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Enrique Quintero; Cesare Hassan; Carlo Senore; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.