OBJECTIVE: The optimum selection and sequencing of combination antiretroviral therapy to maintain viral suppression can be challenging. The HIV Resistance Response Database Initiative has pioneered the development of computational models that predict the virological response to drug combinations. Here we describe the development and testing of random forest models to power an online treatment selection tool. METHODS: Five thousand, seven hundred and fifty-two treatment change episodes were selected to train a committee of 10 models to predict the probability of virological response to a new regimen. The input variables were antiretroviral treatment history, baseline CD4 cell count, viral load and genotype, drugs in the new regimen, time from treatment change to follow-up and follow-up viral load values. The models were assessed during cross-validation and with an independent set of 50 treatment change episodes by plotting receiver-operator characteristic curves and their performance compared with genotypic sensitivity scores from rules-based genotype interpretation systems. RESULTS: The models achieved an area under the curve during cross-validation of 0.77-0.87 (mean = 0.82), accuracy of 72-81% (mean = 77%), sensitivity of 62-80% (mean = 67%) and specificity of 75-89% (mean = 81%). When tested with the 50 test cases, the area under the curve was 0.70-0.88, accuracy 64-82%, sensitivity 62-80% and specificity 68-95%. The genotypic sensitivity scores achieved an area under the curve of 0.51-0.52, overall accuracy of 54-56%, sensitivity of 43-64% and specificity of 41-73%. CONCLUSION: The models achieved a consistent, high level of accuracy in predicting treatment responses, which was markedly superior to that of genotypic sensitivity scores. The models are being used to power an experimental system now available via the Internet.
OBJECTIVE: The optimum selection and sequencing of combination antiretroviral therapy to maintain viral suppression can be challenging. The HIV Resistance Response Database Initiative has pioneered the development of computational models that predict the virological response to drug combinations. Here we describe the development and testing of random forest models to power an online treatment selection tool. METHODS: Five thousand, seven hundred and fifty-two treatment change episodes were selected to train a committee of 10 models to predict the probability of virological response to a new regimen. The input variables were antiretroviral treatment history, baseline CD4 cell count, viral load and genotype, drugs in the new regimen, time from treatment change to follow-up and follow-up viral load values. The models were assessed during cross-validation and with an independent set of 50 treatment change episodes by plotting receiver-operator characteristic curves and their performance compared with genotypic sensitivity scores from rules-based genotype interpretation systems. RESULTS: The models achieved an area under the curve during cross-validation of 0.77-0.87 (mean = 0.82), accuracy of 72-81% (mean = 77%), sensitivity of 62-80% (mean = 67%) and specificity of 75-89% (mean = 81%). When tested with the 50 test cases, the area under the curve was 0.70-0.88, accuracy 64-82%, sensitivity 62-80% and specificity 68-95%. The genotypic sensitivity scores achieved an area under the curve of 0.51-0.52, overall accuracy of 54-56%, sensitivity of 43-64% and specificity of 41-73%. CONCLUSION: The models achieved a consistent, high level of accuracy in predicting treatment responses, which was markedly superior to that of genotypic sensitivity scores. The models are being used to power an experimental system now available via the Internet.
Authors: Andrew D Revell; Dechao Wang; Maria-Jesus Perez-Elias; Robin Wood; Dolphina Cogill; Hugo Tempelman; Raph L Hamers; Peter Reiss; Ard I van Sighem; Catherine A Rehm; Anton Pozniak; Julio S G Montaner; H Clifford Lane; Brendan A Larder Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: A D Revell; D Wang; R Wood; C Morrow; H Tempelman; R L Hamers; G Alvarez-Uria; A Streinu-Cercel; L Ene; A M J Wensing; F DeWolf; M Nelson; J S Montaner; H C Lane; B A Larder Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Andrew D Revell; Luminiţa Ene; Dan Duiculescu; Dechao Wang; Mike Youle; Anton Pozniak; Julio Montaner; Brendan A Larder Journal: Germs Date: 2012-03-01
Authors: Andrew D Revell; Dechao Wang; Robin Wood; Carl Morrow; Hugo Tempelman; Raph L Hamers; Peter Reiss; Ard I van Sighem; Mark Nelson; Julio S G Montaner; H Clifford Lane; Brendan A Larder Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Andrew D Revell; Dechao Wang; Robin Wood; Carl Morrow; Hugo Tempelman; Raph Hamers; Gerardo Alvarez-Uria; Adrian Streinu-Cercel; Luminita Ene; Annemarie Wensing; Peter Reiss; Ard I van Sighem; Mark Nelson; Sean Emery; Julio S G Montaner; H Clifford Lane; Brendan A Larder Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-11-24 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Andrew D Revell; Gerardo Alvarez-Uria; Dechao Wang; Anton Pozniak; Julio S Montaner; H Clifford Lane; Brendan A Larder Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Andrea De Luca; Philippe Flandre; David Dunn; Maurizio Zazzi; Annemarie Wensing; Maria Mercedes Santoro; Huldrych F Günthard; Linda Wittkop; Theodoros Kordossis; Federico Garcia; Antonella Castagna; Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri; Duncan Churchill; Stéphane De Wit; Norbert H Brockmeyer; Arkaitz Imaz; Cristina Mussini; Niels Obel; Carlo Federico Perno; Bernardino Roca; Peter Reiss; Eugen Schülter; Carlo Torti; Ard van Sighem; Robert Zangerle; Diane Descamps Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Andrew D Revell; Dechao Wang; Maria-Jesus Perez-Elias; Robin Wood; Dolphina Cogill; Hugo Tempelman; Raph L Hamers; Peter Reiss; Ard van Sighem; Catherine A Rehm; Brian Agan; Gerardo Alvarez-Uria; Julio S G Montaner; H Clifford Lane; Brendan A Larder Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Roger Paredes; Philip L Tzou; Gert van Zyl; Geoff Barrow; Ricardo Camacho; Sergio Carmona; Philip M Grant; Ravindra K Gupta; Raph L Hamers; P Richard Harrigan; Michael R Jordan; Rami Kantor; David A Katzenstein; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Frank Maldarelli; Dan Otelea; Carole L Wallis; Jonathan M Schapiro; Robert W Shafer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 3.752