BACKGROUND:Cerebral vasogenic edema (VE) has been reported to occur during antiamyloid immunotherapy. VE may be associated with central nervous system pathology with blood-brain barrier disruptions; however, less is known about the prevalence of naturally occurring VE in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging sequences were obtained from four ongoing multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. The first set of baseline scans was from patients in volumetric magnetic resonance imaging addenda in the Interrupting Alzheimer's Dementia by EvaluatiNg Treatment of Amyloid PaThologY (IDENTITY) studies examining semagacestat, a γ-secretase inhibitor (cohort 1, n = 621). The second set of baseline scans was from the EXPanding alzhEimer's Disease InvestigaTIONs (EXPEDITION) studies examining solanezumab, an anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody (cohort 2, n = 2141). Readers were blinded to patient-identifying information and future treatment. A third set of baseline scans was from the first 700 patients who underwent protocol-specified magnetic resonance imaging before randomization in the EXPEDITION studies (cohort 3). The analysis used three neuroradiologists: two performed independent primary interpretations and the third was the adjudicator. Readers were blinded to patient information, treatment, protocol, and time point. RESULTS: Four cases of asymptomatic VE were detected at baseline/screening. Two VE cases were due to underlying extra-axial mass lesions. The third VE case was associated with numerous microhemorrhages in keeping with cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation or Aβ-related angiitis. The final VE case demonstrated localized sulcal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging hyperintensity. No VE was detected in cohort 3 by readers blinded to patient baseline status. CONCLUSIONS: VE seems to be rare at baseline in patients with AD in clinical trials, 2 of 2,762 associated with AD. Additional cohorts should be evaluated to support these findings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Cerebral vasogenic edema (VE) has been reported to occur during antiamyloid immunotherapy. VE may be associated with central nervous system pathology with blood-brain barrier disruptions; however, less is known about the prevalence of naturally occurring VE in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging sequences were obtained from four ongoing multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. The first set of baseline scans was from patients in volumetric magnetic resonance imaging addenda in the Interrupting Alzheimer's Dementia by EvaluatiNg Treatment of Amyloid PaThologY (IDENTITY) studies examining semagacestat, a γ-secretase inhibitor (cohort 1, n = 621). The second set of baseline scans was from the EXPanding alzhEimer's Disease InvestigaTIONs (EXPEDITION) studies examining solanezumab, an anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody (cohort 2, n = 2141). Readers were blinded to patient-identifying information and future treatment. A third set of baseline scans was from the first 700 patients who underwent protocol-specified magnetic resonance imaging before randomization in the EXPEDITION studies (cohort 3). The analysis used three neuroradiologists: two performed independent primary interpretations and the third was the adjudicator. Readers were blinded to patient information, treatment, protocol, and time point. RESULTS: Four cases of asymptomatic VE were detected at baseline/screening. Two VE cases were due to underlying extra-axial mass lesions. The third VE case was associated with numerous microhemorrhages in keeping with cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation or Aβ-related angiitis. The final VE case demonstrated localized sulcal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging hyperintensity. No VE was detected in cohort 3 by readers blinded to patient baseline status. CONCLUSIONS: VE seems to be rare at baseline in patients with AD in clinical trials, 2 of 2,762 associated with AD. Additional cohorts should be evaluated to support these findings.
Authors: Tomomi Kiyota; Kaitlin L Ingraham; Michael T Jacobsen; Huangui Xiong; Tsuneya Ikezu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carolyn Akers; Lealani May Y Acosta; Ciaran Considine; Daniel Claassen; Howard Kirshner; Matthew Schrag Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Oskar Adolfsson; Maria Pihlgren; Nicolas Toni; Yvan Varisco; Anna Lucia Buccarello; Katia Antoniello; Sophie Lohmann; Kasia Piorkowska; Valerie Gafner; Jasvinder K Atwal; Janice Maloney; Mark Chen; Alvin Gogineni; Robby M Weimer; Deborah L Mortensen; Michel Friesenhahn; Carole Ho; Robert Paul; Andrea Pfeifer; Andreas Muhs; Ryan J Watts Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Anne F Wiegman; Irene B Meier; Nicole Schupf; Jennifer J Manly; Vanessa A Guzman; Atul Narkhede; Yaakov Stern; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Anand Viswanathan; José A Luchsinger; Steven M Greenberg; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: J Barakos; R Sperling; S Salloway; C Jack; A Gass; J B Fiebach; D Tampieri; D Melançon; Y Miaux; G Rippon; R Black; Y Lu; H R Brashear; H M Arrighi; K A Morris; M Grundman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Reisa Sperling; Stephen Salloway; David J Brooks; Donatella Tampieri; Jerome Barakos; Nick C Fox; Murray Raskind; Marwan Sabbagh; Lawrence S Honig; Anton P Porsteinsson; Ivan Lieberburg; H Michael Arrighi; Kristen A Morris; Yuan Lu; Enchi Liu; Keith M Gregg; H Robert Brashear; Gene G Kinney; Ronald Black; Michael Grundman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 44.182