Literature DB >> 21784095

The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment.

Tom Foulsham1, Esther Walker, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

How do people distribute their visual attention in the natural environment? We and our colleagues have usually addressed this question by showing pictures, photographs or videos of natural scenes under controlled conditions and recording participants' eye movements as they view them. In the present study, we investigated whether people distribute their gaze in the same way when they are immersed and moving in the world compared to when they view video clips taken from the perspective of a walker. Participants wore a mobile eye tracker while walking to buy a coffee, a trip that required a short walk outdoors through the university campus. They subsequently watched first-person videos of the walk in the lab. Our results focused on where people directed their eyes and their head, what objects were gazed at and when attention-grabbing items were selected. Eye movements were more centralised in the real world, and locations around the horizon were selected with head movements. Other pedestrians, the path, and objects in the distance were looked at often in both the lab and the real world. However, there were some subtle differences in how and when these items were selected. For example, pedestrians close to the walker were fixated more often when viewed on video than in the real world. These results provide a crucial test of the relationship between real behaviour and eye movements measured in the lab.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21784095     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  89 in total

Review 1.  Eye movements and their functions in everyday tasks.

Authors:  T Foulsham
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Live interaction distinctively shapes social gaze dynamics in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Olga Dal Monte; Matthew Piva; Jason A Morris; Steve W C Chang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Focusing on the face or getting distracted by social signals? The effect of distracting gestures on attentional focus in natural interaction.

Authors:  Jasmin Kajopoulos; Gordon Cheng; Koichi Kise; Hermann J Müller; Agnieszka Wykowska
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-07-23

4.  Smooth pursuits decrease balance control during locomotion in young and older healthy females.

Authors:  Neil M Thomas; Susan Dewhurst; Theodoros M Bampouras; Tim Donovan; Andrea Macaluso; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The Developing Infant Creates a Curriculum for Statistical Learning.

Authors:  Linda B Smith; Swapnaa Jayaraman; Elizabeth Clerkin; Chen Yu
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Real-world visual statistics and infants' first-learned object names.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Clerkin; Elizabeth Hart; James M Rehg; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Gaze behavior during navigation with reduced acuity.

Authors:  Andrew Freedman; Jacob Achtemeier; Yihwa Baek; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Active vision in passive locomotion: real-world free viewing in infants and adults.

Authors:  Kari S Kretch; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-11-28

9.  Contributions of head-mounted cameras to studying the visual environments of infants and young children.

Authors:  Linda Smith; Chen Yu; Hanako Yoshida; Caitlin M Fausey
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2015

10.  Mind the step: complementary effects of an implicit task on eye and head movements in real-life gaze allocation.

Authors:  Bernard Marius 't Hart; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.