Literature DB >> 28578478

Smooth pursuits decrease balance control during locomotion in young and older healthy females.

Neil M Thomas1,2, Susan Dewhurst3, Theodoros M Bampouras3, Tim Donovan3, Andrea Macaluso4, Giuseppe Vannozzi4.   

Abstract

Dynamic balance control-characterised as movement of the trunk and lower limbs-was assessed during fixation of a fixed target, smooth pursuits and saccadic eye movements in ten young (22.9 ± 1.5 years) and ten older (72.1 ± 8.2 years) healthy females walking overground. Participants were presented with visual stimuli to initiate eye movements, and posture and gaze were assessed with motion analysis and eye tracking equipment. The results showed an increase in medial/lateral (ML) trunk movement (C7: p = 0.012; sacrum: p = 0.009) and step-width variability (p = 0.052) during smooth pursuits compared to a fixed target, with no changes for saccades compared to a fixed target. The elders demonstrated greater ML trunk movement (sacrum: p = 0.037) and step-width variability (p = 0.037) than the younger adults throughout, although this did not interact with the eye movements. The findings showed that smooth pursuits decreased balance control in young and older adults similarly, which was likely a consequence of more complicated retinal flow. Since healthy elders are typically already at a postural disadvantage, further decreases in balance caused by smooth pursuits are undesirable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly gait; Eye movements; Postural control; Saccades; Step-variability; Walking posture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28578478     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4996-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

Review 1.  Optic flow and eye movements.

Authors:  M Lappe; K P Hoffmann
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.230

2.  Number of strides required for reliable measurements of pace, rhythm and variability parameters of gait during normal and dual task walking in older individuals.

Authors:  John H Hollman; Katherine B Childs; Megan L McNeil; Amy C Mueller; Christopher M Quilter; James W Youdas
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field.

Authors:  Patricia M McAndrew; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Old age affects gaze and postural coordination.

Authors:  Caroline Paquette; Joyce Fung
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Multisensory reweighting of vision and touch is intact in healthy and fall-prone older adults.

Authors:  Leslie K Allison; Tim Kiemel; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Estimating heading during eye movements.

Authors:  C S Royden; J A Crowell; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Distance to achieve steady state walking speed in frail elderly persons.

Authors:  U Lindemann; B Najafi; W Zijlstra; K Hauer; R Muche; C Becker; K Aminian
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Reading from a Head-Fixed Display during Walking: Adverse Effects of Gaze Stabilization Mechanisms.

Authors:  Olivier Borg; Remy Casanova; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.