Literature DB >> 21783494

Biological markers for metal toxicity.

Poonam Kakkar1, Farhat N Jaffery.   

Abstract

Exposure assessment is often considered the weakest link in risk assessment. It is important for investigators to continue to utilize the full potential of biomarkers for chemicals whose exposure is of global concern. This review is concerned with the biomarkers of metal toxicity, as the overall exposure to metals encountered occupationally or in the environment would continue causing indirect, delayed effects therefore ecoepidemiology, using designed molecular probes and noninvasive diagnostics will be the leading component for future management of environmental health. An attempt is made here at appraising the need for the development of more biomarkers for use in environmental epidemiology and health risk assessment.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 21783494     DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 1382-6689            Impact factor:   4.860


  25 in total

1.  Composition of heavy metals and airborne fibers in the indoor environment of a building during renovation.

Authors:  Mohd Talib Latif; Nor Hafizah Baharudin; Puvaneswary Velayutham; Normah Awang; Harimah Hamdan; Ruqyyah Mohamad; Mazlin B Mokhtar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Ecotoxicological evaluation for the screening of areas polluted by mining activities.

Authors:  M L García-Lorenzo; M J Martínez-Sánchez; C Pérez-Sirvent; J Molina
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Effects of lead and mercury on the blood proteome of children.

Authors:  Robert E Birdsall; Michael P Kiley; Zaneer M Segu; Christopher D Palmer; Milan Madera; Brooks B Gump; James A MacKenzie; Patrick J Parsons; Yehia Mechref; Milos V Novotny; Kestutis G Bendinskas
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Assessing human metal accumulations in an urban superfund site.

Authors:  M Katie Hailer; Christopher P Peck; Michael W Calhoun; Robert F West; Kyle J James; Steven D Siciliano
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Improving the efficiency of phytoremediation using electrically charged plant and chelating agents.

Authors:  Iman Tahmasbian; Ali Akbar Safari Sinegani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Arsenic and manganese alter lead deposition in the rat.

Authors:  V Andrade; M L Mateus; D Santos; M Aschner; M C Batoreu; A P Marreilha dos Santos
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Lead, Arsenic, and Manganese Metal Mixture Exposures: Focus on Biomarkers of Effect.

Authors:  V M Andrade; M L Mateus; M C Batoréu; M Aschner; A P Marreilha dos Santos
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  The distribution and extent of heavy metal accumulation in song sparrows along Arizona's upper Santa Cruz River.

Authors:  Michael B Lester; Charles van Riper
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Urinary delta-ALA: a potential biomarker of exposure and neurotoxic effect in rats co-treated with a mixture of lead, arsenic and manganese.

Authors:  Vanda Andrade; M Luísa Mateus; M Camila Batoréu; Michael Aschner; A P Marreilha dos Santos
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  Copper toxicity in a natural reference soil: ecotoxicological data for the derivation of preliminary soil screening values.

Authors:  Ana Luísa Caetano; Catarina Ribeiro Marques; Fernando Gonçalves; Eduardo Ferreira da Silva; Ruth Pereira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.