Literature DB >> 21782545

Effects of simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex.

Laura Mordillo-Mateos1, Laura Turpin-Fenoll2, Jorge Millán-Pascual2, Natalia Núñez-Pérez1, Ivan Panyavin1, José Maria Gómez-Argüelles1, Enrique Botia-Paniagua2, Guglielmo Foffani3, Nicolas Lang4, Antonio Oliviero5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that has been investigated as a therapeutic tool for different neurologic disorders. Neuronal excitability can be modified by application of DC in a polarity-specific manner: anodal tDCS increases excitability, while cathodal tDCS decreases excitability. Previous research has shown that simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex facilitates motor performance in the anodal stimulated hemisphere much more than when the same hemisphere is stimulated using unilateral anodal motor cortex tDCS.
OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous bilateral tDCS is able to increase cortical excitability in one hemisphere whereas decreasing cortical excitability in the contralateral hemisphere. To test our hypothesis, cortical excitability before and after bilateral motor cortex tDCS was evaluated. Moreover, the effects of bilateral tDCS were compared with those of unilateral motor cortex tDCS.
METHODS: We evaluated cortical excitability in healthy volunteers before and after unilateral or bilateral tDCS using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
RESULTS: We demonstrated that simultaneous application of anodal tDCS over the motor cortex and cathodal tDCS over the contralateral motor cortex induces an increase in cortical excitability on the anodal-stimulated side and a decrease in the cathodal stimulated side. We also used the electrode montage (motor cortex-contralateral orbit) method to compare the bilateral tDCS montage with unilateral tDCS montage. The simultaneous bilateral tDCS induced similar effects to the unilateral montage on the cathode-stimulated side. On the anodal tDCS side, the simultaneous bilateral tDCS seems to be a slightly less robust electrode arrangement compared with the placement of electrodes in the motor cortex-contralateral orbit montage. We also found that intersubject variability of the excitability changes that were induced by the anodal motor cortex tDCS using the bilateral montage was lower than that with the unilateral montage.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in which cortical excitability before and after bilateral motor cortex tDCS was extensively evaluated, and the effects of bilateral tDCS were compared with unilateral motor cortex tDCS. Simultaneous bilateral tDCS seems to be a useful tool to obtain increases in cortical excitability of one hemisphere whereas causing decreases of cortical excitability in the contralateral hemisphere (e.g.,to treat stroke).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21782545     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  43 in total

1.  Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.

Authors:  Alana B McCambridge; James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Developing an optimized strategy with transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance the endogenous pain control system in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Dante Duarte; Luis Eduardo Coutinho Castelo-Branco; Elif Uygur Kucukseymen; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Dylan J Edwards; Giulio Ruffini; Douglas Labar; Argyrios Stampas; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Mar Cortes
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric hemiparesis: randomized controlled preliminary study.

Authors:  Bernadette T Gillick; Tim Feyma; Jeremiah Menk; Michelle Usset; Amy Vaith; Teddi Jean Wood; Rebecca Worthington; Linda E Krach
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-11-20

7.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Improving Naming Abilities Among Healthy Young-Old Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat; Nira Mashal
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02

9.  Motor costs and the coordination of the two arms.

Authors:  Yousef Salimpour; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function.

Authors:  Marco Curado; Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.