BACKGROUND: Problems inhibiting non-adaptive behaviors have been linked to an increased risk for substance use and other risk taking behaviors in adolescence. This study examines the hypothesis that abnormalities in neural activation during inhibition in early adolescence may predict subsequent substance involvement. METHODS: Thirty eight adolescents from local area middle schools, ages 12-14, with very limited histories of substance use, underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as they performed a go/no-go task of response inhibition and response selection. Adolescents and their parents were then followed annually with interviews covering substance use and other behaviors. Based on follow-up data, youth were classified as transitioning to heavy use of alcohol (TU; n=21), or as healthy controls (CON; n=17). RESULTS: At baseline, prior to the onset of use, youth who later transitioned into heavy use of alcohol showed significantly less activation than those who went on to remain non to minimal users throughout adolescence. Activation reductions in TU at baseline were seen on no-go trials in 12 brain regions, including right inferior frontal gyrus, left dorsal and medial frontal areas, bilateral motor cortex, cingulate gyrus, left putamen, bilateral middle temporal gyri, and bilateral inferior parietal lobules (corrected p<.01, each cluster ≥32 contiguous voxels). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that less neural activity during response inhibition demands predicts future involvement with problem behaviors such as alcohol and other substance use. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Problems inhibiting non-adaptive behaviors have been linked to an increased risk for substance use and other risk taking behaviors in adolescence. This study examines the hypothesis that abnormalities in neural activation during inhibition in early adolescence may predict subsequent substance involvement. METHODS: Thirty eight adolescents from local area middle schools, ages 12-14, with very limited histories of substance use, underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as they performed a go/no-go task of response inhibition and response selection. Adolescents and their parents were then followed annually with interviews covering substance use and other behaviors. Based on follow-up data, youth were classified as transitioning to heavy use of alcohol (TU; n=21), or as healthy controls (CON; n=17). RESULTS: At baseline, prior to the onset of use, youth who later transitioned into heavy use of alcohol showed significantly less activation than those who went on to remain non to minimal users throughout adolescence. Activation reductions in TU at baseline were seen on no-go trials in 12 brain regions, including right inferior frontal gyrus, left dorsal and medial frontal areas, bilateral motor cortex, cingulate gyrus, left putamen, bilateral middle temporal gyri, and bilateral inferior parietal lobules (corrected p<.01, each cluster ≥32 contiguous voxels). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that less neural activity during response inhibition demands predicts future involvement with problem behaviors such as alcohol and other substance use. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: K Rubia; S Overmeyer; E Taylor; M Brammer; S C Williams; A Simmons; C Andrew; E T Bullmore Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Alecia D Schweinsburg; Martin P Paulus; Valerie C Barlett; Lauren A Killeen; Lisa C Caldwell; Carmen Pulido; Sandra A Brown; Susan F Tapert Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Simon J C Davies; Smita A Pandit; Adrian Feeney; Brian J Stevenson; Robert W Kerwin; David J Nutt; E Jane Marshall; Stephen Boddington; Anne Lingford-Hughes Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Susan F Tapert; Alecia D Schweinsburg; Valerie C Barlett; Sandra A Brown; Lawrence R Frank; Gregory G Brown; M J Meloy Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Samuel M McClure Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Lindsay M Squeglia; Jeff Boissoneault; Candice E Van Skike; Sara Jo Nixon; Douglas B Matthews Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Alexander L Wallace; Kristin E Maple; Alicia T Barr; Krista M Lisdahl Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2020-07-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Ali Cheetham; Nicholas B Allen; Sarah Whittle; Julian Simmons; Murat Yücel; Dan I Lubman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Amanda Elton; Shanti P Tripathi; Tanja Mletzko; Jonathan Young; Josh M Cisler; G Andrew James; Clinton D Kilts Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 5.038