Literature DB >> 14980576

Trend detection via temporal difference model predicts inferior prefrontal cortex activation during acquisition of advantageous action selection.

Martin P Paulus1, Justin S Feinstein, Susan F Tapert, Thomas T Liu.   

Abstract

The process of accurately predicting which actions are associated with advantageous versus disadvantageous outcomes is an important function of daily life. An integral part of this process is being able to detect when the association between an action and an outcome changes. This investigation examined the hypothesis that the inferior prefrontal cortex is critical for the detection of trends and that a trend process derived from the temporal difference model accomplishes this detection. Nineteen normal right-handed volunteers completed 120 4-s trials of a Rock Paper Scissors (RPS) task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Subjects acquired the selection of advantageous actions during the RPS task. Activations in the medial frontal gyrus (BA 10), left ventrolateral frontal gyrus (BA 11/47), and left pallidum were significantly higher during trials in which subjects acquired the advantageous action. The time course of individually derived trend detection functions was found to be time-locked to the hemodynamic changes in the inferior frontal gyrus. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the inferior prefrontal cortex computes a trend from previously experienced action-outcome sequences based on a value function derived from the temporal difference model.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14980576     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  Behavioral and neural predictors of upcoming decisions.

Authors:  M X Cohen; C Ranganath
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Cocaine dependent individuals with attenuated striatal activation during reinforcement learning are more susceptible to relapse.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stewart; Colm G Connolly; April C May; Susan F Tapert; Marc Wittmann; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  Young adults at risk for stimulant dependence show reward dysfunction during reinforcement-based decision making.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stewart; Taru M Flagan; April C May; Martina Reske; Alan N Simmons; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Optimizing vs. matching: response strategy in a probabilistic learning task is associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Zuzana Kasanova; James A Waltz; Gregory P Strauss; Michael J Frank; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Striatum and insula dysfunction during reinforcement learning differentiates abstinent and relapsed methamphetamine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stewart; Colm G Connolly; April C May; Susan F Tapert; Marc Wittmann; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of spatial working memory in children with prenatal alcohol exposure: contribution of familial history of alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Andria L Norman; Jessica W O'Brien; Andrea D Spadoni; Susan F Tapert; Kenneth Lyons Jones; Edward P Riley; Sarah N Mattson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  You are the danger: attenuated insula response in methamphetamine users during aversive interoceptive decision-making.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stewart; April C May; Tasha Poppa; Paul W Davenport; Susan F Tapert; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Probabilistic reversal learning impairments in schizophrenia: further evidence of orbitofrontal dysfunction.

Authors:  James A Waltz; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Frontal operculum temporal difference signals and social motor response learning.

Authors:  Poornima Kumar; Gordon Waiter; Trevor Ahearn; Maarten Milders; Ian Reid; J Douglas Steele
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.