Literature DB >> 21781015

The value to patients of reducing lesion severity in plaque psoriasis.

A Brett Hauber1, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, Brad Schenkel, Jennifer H Lofland, Silas Martin.   

Abstract

Plaque psoriasis is associated with significant psychosocial, quality-of-life, and economic burden. The objective of this study was to quantify the value to patients of reducing the severity and size of plaque psoriasis lesions. Subjects included individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of plaque psoriasis from a nationally representative US household panel. Subjects completed a web-based conjoint analysis survey and chose between hypothetical treatments in a series of questions. Each alternative was defined by lesion severity, percentage of body surface area (BSA) covered by lesions, type of treatment, injection discomfort or pain (if treatment included injections), risk of serious lung infection, and monthly out-of-pocket cost. 28,200 panelists were invited to participate. 18,330 responded, 503 qualified, and 419 completed the survey. Mean age was 54.5 years and 52% were female. 64% (35%) of patients reported psoriasis severity as mild or mild to moderate (moderate to very severe). Patients were willing to pay $486.73 out-of-pocket per month to eliminate severe lesions covering 25% BSA on the arms and legs and $444.80 out-of-pocket per month to eliminate moderate lesions covering 4% BSA on the face. Individuals with plaque psoriasis are willing to pay substantial amounts to reduce lesion severity and percentage of BSA covered by lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21781015     DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2011.588193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatolog Treat        ISSN: 0954-6634            Impact factor:   3.359


  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and histologic diagnostic guidelines for psoriasis: a critical review.

Authors:  Mary Ann N Johnson; April W Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Eliciting preferences to inform patient-centred policies: the case of psoriasis.

Authors:  Aleksandra Torbica; Giovanni Fattore; Fabio Ayala
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Evaluating Risk Tolerance from a Systematic Review of Preferences: The Case of Patients with Psoriasis.

Authors:  Juan Marcos Gonzalez
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Are We Ready Yet?

Authors:  Caroline M Vass; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Comparison of US patient, rheumatologist, and dermatologist perceptions of psoriatic disease symptoms: results from the DISCONNECT study.

Authors:  M Elaine Husni; Anthony Fernandez; Brett Hauber; Rakesh Singh; Joshua Posner; Jessie Sutphin; Arijit Ganguli
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Effect of pill burden on dosing preferences, willingness to pay, and likely adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Steven Han; Jui-Chen Yang; Ira Gantz; Kaan Tunceli; Juan Marcos Gonzalez; Kimberly Brodovicz; Charles M Alexander; Michael Davies; Kristy Iglay; Qiaoyi Zhang; Larry Radican
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Patients' preferences for bone metastases treatments in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Guy Hechmati; A Brett Hauber; Jorge Arellano; Ateesha F Mohamed; Yi Qian; Francesca Gatta; Ian Haynes; Amit Bahl; Roger von Moos; Jean-Jacques Body
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Preference for pharmaceutical formulation and treatment process attributes.

Authors:  Katie D Stewart; Joseph A Johnston; Louis S Matza; Sarah E Curtis; Henry A Havel; Stephanie A Sweetana; Heather L Gelhorn
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.