Literature DB >> 2177921

Performance and prognosis in patients with lung cancer. The Edinburgh Lung Cancer Group.

S Capewell, M F Sudlow.   

Abstract

The Edinburgh Lung Cancer Group prospectively registered 651 new patients presenting with lung cancer during 1981; only 47 survived five years (7%). The survival rate was highest in patients selected for surgery (35/116, 30%) and in this group was related to cell type, stage of disease, and possibly to Karnofsky performance score (not statistically significant). By comparison with non-surgical patients these 116 patients undergoing surgery were highly selected in terms of age, favourable histological type, stage of disease, and performance score. Forty-two of the 535 non-surgical patients were given radical radiotherapy alone and seven (17%) survived five years. The remaining 493 received palliative radiotherapy, chemotherapy (alone or combined with radiotherapy), or symptomatic treatment alone; only five (1%) survived five years. Median survival was related to cell type (adenocarcinoma 2.6 months, squamous cell carcinoma 6.2 months), stage (stage I 8.5 months, stage III 4 months), and Karnofsky performance index (greater than or equal to 90 9.3 months, less than or equal to 50 1.2 months). Age and sex had no independent prognostic value in any group. Performance score was highly correlated with stage (and age) and in this study represented the "best prognostic factor" in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2177921      PMCID: PMC462845          DOI: 10.1136/thx.45.12.951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  27 in total

1.  The natural history of lung cancer: a review based on rates of tumour growth.

Authors:  D M Geddes
Journal:  Br J Dis Chest       Date:  1979-01

2.  Survival experience of women with bronchial carcinoma.

Authors:  J R Bignall; M Martin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Symptoms and survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  R N Johnston; D H Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-11-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Natural course of inoperable lung cancer.

Authors:  L Hyde; J Wolf; S McCracken; R Yesner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Bronchoalveolar lavage.

Authors:  J B Gee; R B Fick
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  A profile of treatment approaches used at comprehensive cancer centers.

Authors:  J Laszlo; R Lenhard; S Dahlberg; P Feigl
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

7.  Assessment of the role of surgery for control of lung cancer.

Authors:  C F Mountain
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Bronchial carcinoma and long-term survival. Retrospective study of 433 patients who underwent resection.

Authors:  G Freise; A Gabler; S Liebig
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Tumour size as a prognostic factor after resection of lung carcinoma.

Authors:  A S Soorae; R A Smith
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Irradiation for inoperable carcinoma of the lung and high performance status.

Authors:  J D Cox; R Komaki; D R Eierst
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980 Oct 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  14 in total

1.  Lung cancer in lifelong non-smokers. Edinburgh Lung Cancer Group.

Authors:  S Capewell; R Sankaran; D Lamb; M McIntyre; M F Sudlow
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Provider impact on survival outcomes in the management of malignant disease.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Prognosis in lung cancer: physicians' opinions compared with outcome and a predictive model.

Authors:  M F Muers; P Shevlin; J Brown
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Vascular invasion in non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  T E Roberts; P S Hasleton; C Musgrove; R Swindell; R A Lawson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The Incidence of Hyponatraemia and Its Effect on the ECOG Performance Status among Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amitabha Sengupta; Sourindra Nath Banerjee; Nirendra Mohan Biswas; Debraj Jash; Kaushik Saha; Arnab Maji; Ankan Bandyopadhyaya; Sandip Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

6.  Lung cancer survival in England: trends in non-small-cell lung cancer survival over the duration of the National Lung Cancer Audit.

Authors:  A Khakwani; A L Rich; H A Powell; L J Tata; R A Stanley; D R Baldwin; J P Duffy; R B Hubbard
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Prognostic Factors in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancerzzm321990Patients

Authors:  Semiha Elmaci Urvay; Birsen Yucel; Eda Erdis; Nedim Turan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-10-01

8.  First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Facchinetti; Massimo Di Maio; Fabiana Perrone; Marcello Tiseo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06

9.  Performance status score: do patients and their oncologists agree?

Authors:  S P Blagden; S C Charman; L D Sharples; L R A Magee; D Gilligan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Course of postoperative relapse in non-small cell lung cancer is strongly associated with post-progression survival.

Authors:  Hisao Imai; Ryoichi Onozato; Kyoichi Kaira; Sayaka Kawashima; Ken Masubuchi; Toshiteru Nagashima; Kohei Tajima; Koichi Minato
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.