BACKGROUND: Nicotine dependence is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Two predominant classification systems, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) and Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), have been used to measure liability to nicotine dependence, yet few studies have attempted to simultaneously examine both sets of criteria. METHODS: Using a sample of 624 regular smoking individuals who are offspring of Vietnam Era Twin fathers ascertained for an offspring of twin study, we applied latent class analysis to the 7 DSM-IV and the 6 FTND criteria to classify individuals by their nicotine dependence symptom profiles. Post-hoc across-class comparisons were conducted using a variety of smoking-related variables and aspects of psychopathology. Whether a single class identified offspring at high genetic and environmental vulnerability was also investigated. RESULTS: The cross-diagnosis kappa was .30. A 4-class solution fit these data best. The classes included a low DSM-low FTND class and a high DSM-high FTND class; a moderate DSM-moderate FTND class, which was distinguished by moderate levels of smoking and intermediate levels of comorbid psychopathology; and a light smoking-moderate FTND class consisting primarily of lighter smokers with a more recent onset of regular smoking. High genetic and environmental vulnerability to nicotine dependence was noted in all classes with no statistically significant across-class differences. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the DSM-IV and FTND criteria performed similarly to define a continuum of risk for nicotine dependence. The emerging class of light smokers should be further investigated to assess whether they transition to another class or remain as such.
BACKGROUND:Nicotine dependence is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Two predominant classification systems, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) and Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), have been used to measure liability to nicotine dependence, yet few studies have attempted to simultaneously examine both sets of criteria. METHODS: Using a sample of 624 regular smoking individuals who are offspring of Vietnam Era Twin fathers ascertained for an offspring of twin study, we applied latent class analysis to the 7 DSM-IV and the 6 FTND criteria to classify individuals by their nicotine dependence symptom profiles. Post-hoc across-class comparisons were conducted using a variety of smoking-related variables and aspects of psychopathology. Whether a single class identified offspring at high genetic and environmental vulnerability was also investigated. RESULTS: The cross-diagnosis kappa was .30. A 4-class solution fit these data best. The classes included a low DSM-low FTND class and a high DSM-high FTND class; a moderate DSM-moderate FTND class, which was distinguished by moderate levels of smoking and intermediate levels of comorbid psychopathology; and a light smoking-moderate FTND class consisting primarily of lighter smokers with a more recent onset of regular smoking. High genetic and environmental vulnerability to nicotine dependence was noted in all classes with no statistically significant across-class differences. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the DSM-IV and FTND criteria performed similarly to define a continuum of risk for nicotine dependence. The emerging class of light smokers should be further investigated to assess whether they transition to another class or remain as such.
Authors: Eric T Moolchan; Aleksandras Radzius; David H Epstein; George Uhl; David A Gorelick; Jean Lud Cadet; Jack E Henningfield Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Tulshi D Saha; Wilson M Compton; Attila J Pulay; Frederick S Stinson; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Bridget F Grant Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Leah Wetherill; Manav Kapoor; Arpana Agrawal; Kathleen Bucholz; Daniel Koller; Sarah E Bertelsen; Nhung Le; Jen-Chyong Wang; Laura Almasy; Victor Hesselbrock; John Kramer; John I Nurnberger; Marc Schuckit; Jay A Tischfield; Xiaoling Xuei; Bernice Porjesz; Howard J Edenberg; Alison M Goate; Tatiana Foroud Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Deborah S Hasin; Charles P O'Brien; Marc Auriacombe; Guilherme Borges; Kathleen Bucholz; Alan Budney; Wilson M Compton; Thomas Crowley; Walter Ling; Nancy M Petry; Marc Schuckit; Bridget F Grant Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ryan Bogdan; Arpana Agrawal; Alexander S Hatoum; Emma C Johnson; Sarah M C Colbert; Renato Polimanti; Hang Zhou; Raymond K Walters; Joel Gelernter; Howard J Edenberg Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Anka A Vujanovic; Samantha G Farris; Christopher B Harte; Jasper A J Smits; Michael J Zvolensky Journal: Ment Health Phys Act Date: 2013-06-01