INTRODUCTION: Alternative tobacco use among adolescents who smoke cigarettes is a growing public health concern, and evidence suggests that patterns of alternative tobacco use varies with respect to cigarette consumption and frequency of cigarette use. This study aimed to examine (a) whether variations in adolescent cigarette smoking and alternative tobacco use can be explained by underlying subtypes and (b) if these subtypes differ in their demographic and psychosocial characteristics. METHODS: Using data from the 2009 National Youth Tobacco Survey, latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify patterns of cigarette smoking and alternative tobacco use among 2746 current (past 30-day) smokers. After identification, classes were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression to examine differences based on demographics and smoking-related characteristics. RESULTS: Four of the six latent classes identified (non-daily light smokers, chippers, chippers-Indulgent, intermittent smokers) reflected consumption, frequency, and history of cigarette use characteristics commonly attributed to light and intermittent smokers, and the remaining two classes (daily smokers, daily smokers-Indulgent) presented cigarette use behaviors commonly attributed to daily smokers. There were clear class differences in levels of alternative tobacco product use, demographics, and psychosocial characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings are consistent with previous work demonstrating demographic and psychosocial differences between cigarette smokers based on their alternative tobacco use. The six latent classes identified highlight the importance of including measures of alternative tobacco use when characterizing adolescent cigarette smokers as well as recognizing and tailoring interventions toward these different groups of tobacco users.
INTRODUCTION: Alternative tobacco use among adolescents who smoke cigarettes is a growing public health concern, and evidence suggests that patterns of alternative tobacco use varies with respect to cigarette consumption and frequency of cigarette use. This study aimed to examine (a) whether variations in adolescent cigarette smoking and alternative tobacco use can be explained by underlying subtypes and (b) if these subtypes differ in their demographic and psychosocial characteristics. METHODS: Using data from the 2009 National Youth Tobacco Survey, latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify patterns of cigarette smoking and alternative tobacco use among 2746 current (past 30-day) smokers. After identification, classes were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression to examine differences based on demographics and smoking-related characteristics. RESULTS: Four of the six latent classes identified (non-daily light smokers, chippers, chippers-Indulgent, intermittent smokers) reflected consumption, frequency, and history of cigarette use characteristics commonly attributed to light and intermittent smokers, and the remaining two classes (daily smokers, daily smokers-Indulgent) presented cigarette use behaviors commonly attributed to daily smokers. There were clear class differences in levels of alternative tobacco product use, demographics, and psychosocial characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings are consistent with previous work demonstrating demographic and psychosocial differences between cigarette smokers based on their alternative tobacco use. The six latent classes identified highlight the importance of including measures of alternative tobacco use when characterizing adolescent cigarette smokers as well as recognizing and tailoring interventions toward these different groups of tobacco users.
Authors: Arpana Agrawal; Michael T Lynskey; Pamela A F Madden; Kathleen K Bucholz; Andrew C Heath Journal: Addiction Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Richard J O'Connor; Ann McNeill; Ron Borland; David Hammond; Bill King; Christian Boudreau; K Michael Cummings Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Alan L Peterson; Herb H Severson; Judy A Andrews; Sherrie P Gott; Jeffrey A Cigrang; Judith S Gordon; Christine M Hunter; Gary C Martin Journal: Mil Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Cathy L Backinger; Pebbles Fagan; Mary E O'Connell; Rachel Grana; Deirdre Lawrence; Jennifer Anne Bishop; James Todd Gibson Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2007-11-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Aashir Nasim; Mignonne C Guy; Eric K Soule; Caroline O Cobb; Melissa D Blank; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Amanda L Johnson; Jessica M Rath; Valerie Williams; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Daniela Golinelli; Daniel Siconolfi; William G Shadel; Rachana Seelam; Joan S Tucker Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Valentin Nădăşan; Kristie L Foley; Melinda Pénzes; Edit Paulik; Ştefan Mihăicuţă; Zoltán Ábrám; Jozsef Bálint; Robert Urbán Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer L Pearson; Jennifer Cantrell; Donna M Vallone; Jessica M Rath Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Paul T Harrell; Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi; Andrew D Plunk; Ming Ji; Silvia S Martins Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 3.829