OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a brief posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening instrument that is useful in clinical practice, similar to the Framingham Risk Score used in cardiovascular medicine. METHODS: We used data collected in New York City after the World Trade Center disaster (WTCD) and other trauma data to develop a new PTSD prediction tool--the New York PTSD Risk Score. We used diagnostic test methods to examine different clinical domains, including PTSD symptoms, trauma exposures, sleep disturbances, suicidal thoughts, depression symptoms, demographic factors and other measures to assess different PTSD prediction models. RESULTS: Using receiver operating curve (ROC) and bootstrap methods, five prediction domains, including core PTSD symptoms, sleep disturbance, access to care status, depression symptoms and trauma history, and five demographic variables, including gender, age, education, race and ethnicity, were identified. For the best prediction model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.880 for the Primary Care PTSD Screen alone (specificity=82.2%, sensitivity=93.7%). Adding care status, sleep disturbance, depression and trauma exposure increased the AUC to 0.943 (specificity=85.7%, sensitivity=93.1%), a significant ROC improvement (P<.0001). Adding demographic variables increased the AUC to 0.945, which was not significant (P=.250). To externally validate these models, we applied the WTCD results to 705 pain patients treated at a multispecialty group practice and to 225 trauma patients treated at a Level I Trauma Center. These results validated those from the original WTCD development and validation samples. CONCLUSION: The New York PTSD Risk Score is a multifactor prediction tool that includes the Primary Care PTSD Screen, depression symptoms, access to care, sleep disturbance, trauma history and demographic variables and appears to be effective in predicting PTSD among patients seen in healthcare settings. This prediction tool is simple to administer and appears to outperform other screening measures.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a brief posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening instrument that is useful in clinical practice, similar to the Framingham Risk Score used in cardiovascular medicine. METHODS: We used data collected in New York City after the World Trade Center disaster (WTCD) and other trauma data to develop a new PTSD prediction tool--the New York PTSD Risk Score. We used diagnostic test methods to examine different clinical domains, including PTSD symptoms, trauma exposures, sleep disturbances, suicidal thoughts, depression symptoms, demographic factors and other measures to assess different PTSD prediction models. RESULTS: Using receiver operating curve (ROC) and bootstrap methods, five prediction domains, including core PTSD symptoms, sleep disturbance, access to care status, depression symptoms and trauma history, and five demographic variables, including gender, age, education, race and ethnicity, were identified. For the best prediction model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.880 for the Primary Care PTSD Screen alone (specificity=82.2%, sensitivity=93.7%). Adding care status, sleep disturbance, depression and trauma exposure increased the AUC to 0.943 (specificity=85.7%, sensitivity=93.1%), a significant ROC improvement (P<.0001). Adding demographic variables increased the AUC to 0.945, which was not significant (P=.250). To externally validate these models, we applied the WTCD results to 705 painpatients treated at a multispecialty group practice and to 225 traumapatients treated at a Level I Trauma Center. These results validated those from the original WTCD development and validation samples. CONCLUSION: The New York PTSD Risk Score is a multifactor prediction tool that includes the Primary Care PTSD Screen, depression symptoms, access to care, sleep disturbance, trauma history and demographic variables and appears to be effective in predicting PTSD among patients seen in healthcare settings. This prediction tool is simple to administer and appears to outperform other screening measures.
Authors: Joseph A Boscarino; H Lester Kirchner; Stuart N Hoffman; Jennifer Sartorius; Richard E Adams; Charles R Figley Journal: Minerva Psichiatr Date: 2012-03
Authors: Joseph A Boscarino; H Lester Kirchner; Stuart N Hoffman; Jennifer Sartorius; Richard E Adams; Charles R Figley Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Erin C Wilson; Yea-Hung Chen; Sean Arayasirikul; Marla Fisher; W Andres Pomart; Victory Le; H Fisher Raymond; Willi McFarland Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Laurie Moore; Denise A Dillard; Jaedon P Avey; Lisa G Dirks; Barbara Beach; Douglas Novins Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Joseph A Boscarino; H Lester Kirchner; Stuart N Hoffman; Jennifer Sartorius Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Jaedon P Avey; Laurie Moore; Barbara Beach; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Lisa G Dirks; Denise A Dillard; Douglas Novins Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 2.267