Literature DB >> 21777890

Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations.

Bon-Kwon Koo1, Hyoung-Mo Yang, Jun-Hyung Doh, Hyunmin Choe, Sung-Yun Lee, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Yun-Kyeong Cho, Chang-Wook Nam, Seung-Ho Hur, Hong-Seok Lim, Myeong-Ho Yoon, Kyung-Woo Park, Sang-Hoon Na, Tae-Jin Youn, Woo-Young Chung, Seunghyun Ma, Sue-Kyung Park, Hyo-Soo Kim, Seung-Jea Tahk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We performed this study to determine the optimal intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria and to evaluate their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses in different locations of the coronary tree.
BACKGROUND: Presence of myocardial ischemia is the most important prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease and is determined by both the lesion severity and the amount of myocardium supplied.
METHODS: IVUS and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements were performed in 267 intermediate lesions located at the proximal or mid part of major epicardial coronary arteries. Optimal IVUS criteria and their diagnostic accuracy for functionally significant stenoses (FFR <0.8) were assessed.
RESULTS: FFR was <0.8 in 88 lesions (33%). The determinants of FFR were minimum lumen area (MLA) and lesion location. The diagnostic accuracy of MLA was highly variable according to the location of lesions. The best cutoff value of MLA to define the functional significance was 3.0 mm(2) (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 0.91) for proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions and 2.75 mm(2) for mid-LAD lesions located before the second diagonal branch (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.84). However, the appropriate MLA to predict the functional significance of lesions could not be found in other segments.
CONCLUSIONS: When IVUS parameters are used to determine the functional significance of lesions in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses, different criteria should be used according to lesion location. In segments or vessels with anatomic variations, IVUS cannot be used for functional assessment of a stenosis. (Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound; NCT01133015).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777890     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  35 in total

1.  Segmental assessments of coronary plaque morphology and composition by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Chung; Soe Hee Ann; Gillian Balbir Singh; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Hyung Il Kim; Bon-Kwon Koo; Eun-Seok Shin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Method for percutaneously introducing, and removing, anatomical stenosis of predetermined severity in vivo: the "stenotic stent".

Authors:  Nicolas Foin; Sayan Sen; Ricardo Petraco; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Ryo Torii; Chrysa Kousera; Christopher Broyd; Vikram Mehta; Yun Xu; Jamil Mayet; Alun Hughes; Carlo Di Mario; Rob Krams; Darrel Francis; Justin Davies
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR.

Authors:  Tomasz Pawlowski; Francesco Prati; Tomasz Kulawik; Eleonora Ficarra; Jacek Bil; Robert Gil
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Impact of plaque characteristics on the degree of functional stenosis.

Authors:  Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Hector Manuel Garcia-Garcia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

Review 6.  What Is the Clinical Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound?

Authors:  Eisha Wali; Sandeep Nathan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Comparison between minimum lumen cross-sectional area and intraluminal ultrasonic intensity analysis using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound for prediction of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Hironori Takami; Shinjo Sonoda; Yoshitaka Muraoka; Toshiya Miura; Akiyoshi Shimizu; Reo Anai; Yoshinori Sanuki; Tetsu Miyamoto; Yasushi Oginosawa; Yoshihisa Fujino; Yuki Tsuda; Masaru Araki; Yutaka Otsuji
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.

Authors:  Olivier Ghekiere; Willem Dewilde; Michel Bellekens; Denis Hoa; Thierry Couvreur; Julien Djekic; Tim Coolen; Isabelle Mancini; Piet K Vanhoenacker; Paul Dendale; Alain Nchimi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study).

Authors:  Szilard Voros; Sarah Rinehart; Jesus G Vazquez-Figueroa; Anna Kalynych; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Zhen Qian; Parag H Joshi; Hunt Anderson; Laura Murrieta; Charles Wilmer; Harold Carlson; William Ballard; Charles Brown
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Jing Li; Muhamad Y Elrashidi; Andreas J Flammer; Ryan J Lennon; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; John F Bresnahan; Charanjit S Rihal; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.