Literature DB >> 26498340

Segmental assessments of coronary plaque morphology and composition by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve.

Ju-Hyun Chung1, Soe Hee Ann1, Gillian Balbir Singh1, Chang-Wook Nam2, Joon-Hyung Doh3, Hyung Il Kim4, Bon-Kwon Koo5,6, Eun-Seok Shin7.   

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index for identifying functionally significant stenotic lesions. A FFR value of ≤0.75 is considered clinically significant and indicative of physiological ischemia. Focal lesions with 30-80 % stenosis by angiography with lesion lengths of less than 20 mm were selected from left anterior descending arteries of 74 patients. The analysis for the total lesion was processed first, and then each lesion was divided into three segments to assess the each segment. Data on plaque geometry and composition of two FFR groups, FFR ≤ 0.75 and FFR > 0.75, were compared by total and segmental analysis. Lesions with FFR ≤ 0.75 had more fibrofatty tissue (13.5 ± 7.4 vs. 10.2 ± 6.5%, p = 0.05) and less dense calcium (7.2 ± 5.3 vs. 11.9 ± 7.5%, p = 0.01) compared to lesions with FFR > 0.75. The content of necrotic core in mid segments was higher compared to proximal and distal segments (22.9 ± 10.6, 20.2 ± 10.9, 17.1 ± 11.2%, respectively, p = 0.032) in lesions with FFR > 0.75 but the difference was less obvious in lesions with FFR ≤ 0.75 (17.9 ± 9.9, 18.7 ± 9.9, 15.8 ± 9.0%, respectively, p = 0.533). Coronary lesions with FFR > 0.75 have larger content of dense calcium and slightly less fibrofatty tissue compared to lesions with FFR ≤ 0.75. While segmental plaque compositions for each segment show noticeable variations in lesions with FFR > 0.75 such as high concentrations of necrotic core in mid segment, these differences in each segment become obscure in FFR ≤ 0.75 and are evenly distributed across the lesion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Plaque composition; Segmental analysis; Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26498340     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0794-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  14 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Tissue characterisation using intravascular radiofrequency data analysis: recommendations for acquisition, analysis, interpretation and reporting.

Authors:  Héctor M García-García; Gary S Mintz; Amir Lerman; D Geoffrey Vince; M Paulina Margolis; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Marie-Angèle M Morel; Anuja Nair; Renu Virmani; Allen P Burke; Gregg W Stone; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Between-centre reproducibility of volumetric intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency-based analyses in mild-to-moderate coronary atherosclerosis: an international multicentre study.

Authors:  Jennifer Huisman; Rasmus Egede; Adam Rdzanek; Dirk Böse; Raimund Erbel; Janusz Kochman; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Job van de Palen; Marc Hartmann; Gary S Mintz; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.534

4.  In vivo characterization of coronary plaques: novel findings from comparing greyscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jun Pu; Gary S Mintz; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Subhash Banerjee; Abdul-Rahman R Abdel-Karim; Brijeshwar Maini; Sinan Biro; Jin-Bae Lee; Gregg W Stone; Giora Weisz; Akiko Maehara
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Importance of diffuse atherosclerosis in the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in the proximal-mid segment of a coronary artery by myocardial fractional flow reserve measurements.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau; Marcos Gutiérrez; Javier Courtis; Eric Larose; Jean-Pierre Déry; Mélanie Côté; Can Mahn Nguyen; Onil Gleeton; Guy Proulx; Louis Roy; Bernard Noël; Gerald Barbeau; Robert De Larochellière; Stéphane Rinfret; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Evaluation of plaque composition by intravascular ultrasound "virtual histology": the impact of dense calcium on the measurement of necrotic tissue.

Authors:  Fernando J R Sales; Breno A Falcão; João L A Falcão; Expedito E Ribeiro; Marco A Perin; Pedro E Horta; André G Spadaro; John A Ambrose; Eulógio E Martinez; Sergio S Furuie; Pedro A Lemos
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.534

7.  Morphology of coronary artery lesions assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound tissue characterization and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Salvatore Brugaletta; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Zhu Jun Shen; Josep Gomez-Lara; Roberto Diletti; Giovanna Sarno; Nieves Gonzalo; William Wijns; Bernard de Bruyne; Fernando Alfonso; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Morphologic and angiographic features of coronary plaque rupture detected by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Akiko Maehara; Gary S Mintz; Anh B Bui; Olga R Walter; Marco T Castagna; Daniel Canos; August D Pichard; Lowell F Satler; Ron Waksman; William O Suddath; John R Laird; Kenneth M Kent; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  FIRST: Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Relationship Study.

Authors:  Ron Waksman; Jacek Legutko; Jasvindar Singh; Quentin Orlando; Steven Marso; Timothy Schloss; John Tugaoen; James DeVries; Nicholas Palmer; Michael Haude; Stacy Swymelar; Rebecca Torguson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses.

Authors:  N H Pijls; B De Bruyne; K Peels; P H Van Der Voort; H J Bonnier; J J Bartunek J Koolen; J J Koolen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Dense calcium and lesion-specific ischemia: A comparison of CCTA with fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Lohendran Baskaran; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; Joshua Schulman-Marcus; Heidi Gransar; Fay Lin; James K Min
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 5.162

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.