STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether economy of instrument movement can differentiate between skills levels during intracorporeal suturing using a box trainer model. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Skills laboratory of a university teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Forty-two volunteers participated including 19 medical students without previous laparoscopic experience (novices), 12 residents in obstetrics and gynecology (intermediates), and 11 practitioners of intracorporeal suturing who had performed at least 200 laparoscopic procedures including advanced surgery (experts). INTERVENTIONS: Each participant performed 3 consecutive standardized intracorporeal sutures using a box trainer, and instrument movements were recorded using the TrEndo tracking device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness of the instrument tips were recorded. Performance in the 3 groups differed significantly (p <.001 for all parameters; Kruskal-Wallis test). Experts outperformed novices in all 4 parameters (p <.01; Bonferroni test). CONCLUSION: The construct validity has been suggested for time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness for assessment of the laparoscopic suturing task using a box trainer. An expert level has been set for training and assessment purposes. The addition of economy of movement to time to complete the task has the potential to refine acquisition of skills.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether economy of instrument movement can differentiate between skills levels during intracorporeal suturing using a box trainer model. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Skills laboratory of a university teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Forty-two volunteers participated including 19 medical students without previous laparoscopic experience (novices), 12 residents in obstetrics and gynecology (intermediates), and 11 practitioners of intracorporeal suturing who had performed at least 200 laparoscopic procedures including advanced surgery (experts). INTERVENTIONS: Each participant performed 3 consecutive standardized intracorporeal sutures using a box trainer, and instrument movements were recorded using the TrEndo tracking device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness of the instrument tips were recorded. Performance in the 3 groups differed significantly (p <.001 for all parameters; Kruskal-Wallis test). Experts outperformed novices in all 4 parameters (p <.01; Bonferroni test). CONCLUSION: The construct validity has been suggested for time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness for assessment of the laparoscopic suturing task using a box trainer. An expert level has been set for training and assessment purposes. The addition of economy of movement to time to complete the task has the potential to refine acquisition of skills.
Authors: Tim Horeman; Freek van Delft; Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Frank-Willem Jansen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ignacio Oropesa; Patricia Sánchez-González; Magdalena K Chmarra; Pablo Lamata; Alvaro Fernández; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Frank Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Enrique J Gómez Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: S P Rodrigues; T Horeman; M S H Blomjous; E Hiemstra; J J van den Dobbelsteen; F W Jansen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 4.584