Literature DB >> 21777798

Development of visual acuity in preschool children as measured with Landolt C and Tumbling E charts.

Yu-Hung Lai1, Hwei-Zu Wang, Hsin-Tien Hsu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the visual acuity development as measured by Landolt C and Tumbling E charts ("C chart" and "E chart") in preschool children.
METHODS: Visual acuity measurements of healthy children ages 3-6 years who had been evaluated with the use of E charts (during kindergarten screening) and C charts (in a hospital setting) from 2005 to 2007 were studied. Inclusion criteria were hyperopia <4.5 D, myopia <3.0 D, astigmatism <2.0 D, and anisometropia <2.0 D. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in each group was analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 821 children in the E chart group and 212 in the C chart group (mean age, 5 years). The mean BCVA improved from between age 3-4 years and age 5-6 years in both groups (P < 0.001). Children in the C chart group had significantly greater astigmatism compared with those in the E chart group (0.66 D ± 0.47 vs 0.28 D ± 0.39; P < 0.001). The BCVA obtained by E chart was greater than that obtained by C chart at age 3-4 years (logMAR 0.0246 ± 0.0646 vs 0.1158 ± 0.1462, P < 0.001), but not at age 5-6 years.
CONCLUSIONS: When children reach 5-6 years of age, visual acuity values obtained by C and E charts approach those observed in adults. In younger patients, the E chart obtains a greater visual acuity score than the C chart. Thus, thresholds for normal visual acuity in preschool children ages 3-6 years should be both age specific and test specific.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777798     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.

Authors:  O Engin; D D G Despriet; H M van der Meulen-Schot; A Romers; X Slot; M Tjon Fo Sang; M Fronius; H Kelderman; H J Simonsz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.

Authors:  Nijil Sanker; Sayyeda Dhirani; Premjit Bhakat
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

3.  Differences between children with Down syndrome and typically developing children in adaptive behaviour, executive functions and visual acuity.

Authors:  Christine de Weger; F Nienke Boonstra; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.

Authors:  Mladen Bušić; Mirjana Bjeloš; Mladen Petrovečki; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Senad Ramić; Daliborka Miletić; Lidija Andrijašević; Edita Kondža Krstonijević; Vid Jakovljević; Ana Bišćan Tvrdi; Jurica Predović; Antonio Kokot; Filip Bišćan; Mirna Kovačević Ljubić; Ranka Motušić Aras
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 5.  The development of human visual cortex and clinical implications.

Authors:  Caitlin R Siu; Kathryn M Murphy
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2018-04-24

6.  Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.

Authors:  Sandra Guimaraes; Tiago Fernandes; Patrício Costa; Eduardo Silva
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  A reassessment and comparison of the Landolt C and tumbling E charts in managing amblyopia.

Authors:  Yu-Hung Lai; Horng-Jiun Wu; Shun-Jen Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.