Literature DB >> 21777328

Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: the need for defibrillator back-up after an event-free first battery service-life.

Guido H Van Welsenes1, Johannes B Van Rees, Joep Thijssen, Serge A Trines, Lieselot Van Erven, Martin J Schalij, C J W Borleffs.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients, the relatively low incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) combined with the limited battery service-life potentially results in a large group of patients who have had no benefit of the ICD during first service-life. Data on the occurrence of VA after device replacement remain scarce. The purpose of this study was to give clinicians better insight in the dilemma whether or not to replace an ICD after an event-free first battery service-life. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All patients treated with an ICD for primary prevention who had a replacement because of battery depletion and who did not receive appropriate therapy before device replacement were included in this analysis. Of 154 primary prevention ICD patients needing replacement because of battery depletion, 114 (74%) patients (mean age 61 ± 11 years, 80% male) had not received appropriate ICD therapy for VA. Follow-up was 71 ± 24 months after the initial implantation and 25 ± 21 months after device replacement. Following replacement, 3-year cumulative incidence of appropriate therapy in response to ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation was 14% (95% CI 5-22%).
CONCLUSION: The majority of primary prevention ICD patients do not experience VA during first battery service-life. However, a substantial part of these patients does experience appropriate ICD therapy after replacement.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777328     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02134.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  8 in total

1.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator elective generator replacement: a procedure for all?

Authors:  Sergio Barra; Manoj Goonewardene; Patrick Heck; David Begley; Munmohan Virdee; Simon Fynn; Andrew Grace; Sharad Agarwal
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in ischemic heart disease. Programmed ventricular stimulation].

Authors:  Jürgen Potratz
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-07

Review 3.  When Is It Safe Not to Reimplant an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator at the Time of Battery Depletion?

Authors:  Sana M Al-Khatib; Daniel J Friedman; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Clin       Date:  2018-03

4.  Reassessment of cardiovascular parameters and comorbidities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients at the time of first replacement.

Authors:  Sandra Wuest; Raphael Twerenbold; Michael Kühne; Tobias Reichlin; Christian Sticherling; Stefan Osswald; Beat Schaer
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Outcomes of patients with heart failure after primary prevention ICD unit generator replacement.

Authors:  Khang-Li Looi; Andrew Gavin; Lisa Cooper; Liane Dawson; Debbie Slipper; Nigel Lever
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2019-02-28

6.  Incidence of defibrillator shocks after elective generator exchange following uneventful first battery life.

Authors:  Faisal M Merchant; Paul Jones; Scott Wehrenberg; Michael S Lloyd; Leslie A Saxon
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Circadian pattern of short-term variability of the QT-interval in primary prevention ICD patients - EU-CERT-ICD methodological pilot study.

Authors:  David J Sprenkeler; Anton E Tuinenburg; Henk J Ritsema van Eck; Marek Malik; Markus Zabel; Marc A Vos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in a single-center population.

Authors:  Joachim Seegers; Pascal Muñoz Expósito; Lars Lüthje; Thomas Fischer; Matthias Lueken; Hannes Wenk; Samuel T Sossalla; Gerd Hasenfuss; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 1.900

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.