Literature DB >> 21777020

Startle stimuli exert opposite effects on human cortical and spinal motor system excitability in leg muscles.

T V Ilic1, M Pötter-Nerger, I Holler, H R Siebner, N V Ilic, G Deuschl, J Volkmann.   

Abstract

Increased excitability of the spinal motor system has been observed after loud and unexpected acoustic stimuli (AS) preceding H-reflexes. The paradigm has been proposed as an electrophysiological marker of reticulospinal tract activity in humans. The brainstem reticular formation also maintains dense anatomical interconnections with the cortical motor system. When a startling AS is delivered, prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the AS produces a suppression of motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in hand and arm muscles of healthy subjects. Here we analyzed the conditioning effect of a startling AS on MEP amplitude evoked by TMS to the primary motor leg area. Ten healthy volunteers participated in two experiments that used a conditioning-test paradigm. In the first experiment, a startling AS preceded a suprathreshold transcranial test stimulus. The interstimulus interval (ISI) varied between 20 to 160 ms. When given alone, the test stimulus evoked a MEP amplitude of approximately 0.5 mV in the slightly preinervated soleus muscle (SOL). In the second experiment, the startling AS was used to condition the size of the H-reflex in SOL muscle. Mean MEP amplitude was calculated for each ISI. The conditioning AS suppressed MEP amplitude at ISIs of 30-80 ms. By contrast, H-reflex amplitude was augmented at ISIs of 100-200 ms. In conclusions, acoustic stimulation exerts opposite and ISI-specific effects on the amplitude of MEPs and H-reflex in the SOL muscle, indicating different mechanism of auditory-to-motor interactions at cortical and spinal level of motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Res        ISSN: 0862-8408            Impact factor:   1.881


  6 in total

1.  Two-stage muscle activity responses in decisions about leg movement adjustments during trip recovery.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Mirjam Pijnappels; Sabine Verschueren; Jaap van Dieën; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  High-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals differential cortical contributions to prepared responses.

Authors:  Victoria Smith; Dana Maslovat; Neil M Drummond; Joëlle Hajj; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Developing a Tool for Remote Digital Assessment of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kassavetis; Tabish A Saifee; George Roussos; Loukas Drougkas; Maja Kojovic; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards; Kailash P Bhatia
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2015-10-20

5.  Distinct Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Voluntary Control of Elbow Flexor and Extensor Muscles in Humans with Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Different Effects of Startling Acoustic Stimuli (SAS) on TMS-Induced Responses at Rest and during Sustained Voluntary Contraction.

Authors:  Yen-Ting Chen; Shengai Li; Ping Zhou; Sheng Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.