Literature DB >> 21776810

Reduced order constrained optimization (ROCO): clinical application to lung IMRT.

Hans Stabenau1, Linda Rivera, Ellen Yorke, Jie Yang, Renzhi Lu, Richard J Radke, Andrew Jackson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors use reduced-order constrained optimization (ROCO) to create clinically acceptable IMRT plans quickly and automatically for advanced lung cancer patients. Their new ROCO implementation works with the treatment planning system and full dose calculation used at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). The authors have implemented mean dose hard constraints, along with the point-dose and dose-volume constraints that the authors used for our previous work on the prostate.
METHODS: ROCO consists of three major steps. First, the space of treatment plans is sampled by solving a series of optimization problems using penalty-based quadratic objective functions. Next, an efficient basis for this space is found via principal component analysis (PCA); this reduces the dimensionality of the problem. Finally, a constrained optimization problem is solved over this basis to find a clinically acceptable IMRT plan. Dimensionality reduction makes constrained optimization computationally efficient.
RESULTS: The authors apply ROCO to 12 stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, generating IMRT plans that meet all clinical constraints and are clinically acceptable, and demonstrate that they are competitive with the clinical treatment plans. The authors also test how many samples and PCA modes are necessary to achieve an adequate lung plan, demonstrate the importance of long-range dose calculation for ROCO, and evaluate the performance of nonspecific normal tissue ("rind") constraints in ROCO treatment planning for the lung. Finally, authors show that ROCO can save time for planners, and they estimate that in the clinic, planning using their approach would save a median of 105 min for the patients in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: New challenges arise when applying ROCO to the lung site, which include the lack of a class solution, a larger treatment site, an increased number of parameters and beamlets, a variable number of beams and beam arrangement, and the customary use of rinds in clinical plans to avoid high-dose areas outside the PTV. In the authors previous work, use of an approximate dose calculation in the hard constraint optimization sometimes meant that clinical constraints were not met when evaluated with the full dose calculation. This difficulty has been removed in the current work by using the full dose calculation in the hard constraint optimization. The authors have demonstrated that ROCO offers a fast and automatic way to create IMRT plans for advanced NSCLC, which extends their previous application of ROCO to prostate cancer IMRT planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21776810      PMCID: PMC3107833          DOI: 10.1118/1.3575416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  Treatment planning using a dose-volume feasibility search algorithm.

Authors:  G Starkschall; A Pollack; C W Stevens
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  On the degeneracy of the IMRT optimization problem.

Authors:  M Alber; G Meedt; F Nüsslin; R Reemtsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study.

Authors:  Q Wu; M Manning; R Schmidt-Ullrich; R Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning for dynamic multileaf collimator delivery: influence of different parameters on dose distributions.

Authors:  Anna Samuelsson; Karl-Axel Johansson
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Elimination of importance factors for clinically accurate selection of beam orientations, beam weights and wedge angles in conformal radiation therapy.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Steve Webb
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Analyzing the main trade-offs in multiobjective radiation therapy treatment planning databases.

Authors:  Tobias Spalke; David Craft; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A comprehensive three-dimensional radiation treatment planning system.

Authors:  R Mohan; G Barest; L J Brewster; C S Chui; G J Kutcher; J S Laughlin; Z Fuks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms.

Authors:  J T Lyman
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1985

10.  Optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans based on the equivalent uniform dose.

Authors:  Qiuwen Wu; Radhe Mohan; Andrzej Niemierko; Rupert Schmidt-Ullrich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  6 in total

1.  A novel reduced-order prioritized optimization method for radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Georgios Kalantzis; Aditya Apte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Reduced-order constrained optimization (ROCO): clinical application to head-and-neck IMRT.

Authors:  Linda Rivera; Ellen Yorke; Alex Kowalski; Jie Yang; Richard J Radke; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Automated inverse optimization facilitates lower doses to normal tissue in pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ivaylo B Mihaylov; Eric A Mellon; Raphael Yechieli; Lorraine Portelance
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  On the optimal number of dose-limiting shells in the SBRT auto-planning design for peripheral lung cancer.

Authors:  Yanhua Duan; Wutian Gan; Hao Wang; Hua Chen; Hengle Gu; Yan Shao; Aihui Feng; Yanchen Ying; Xiaolong Fu; Chenchen Zhang; Zhiyong Xu; Ning Jeff Yue
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Esophagus and Contralateral Lung-Sparing IMRT for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer in the Community Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Jeffrey Pettit; Soombal Zahid; Kenneth D Gold; Terry Palatt
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Multiobjective, Multidelivery Optimization for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning.

Authors:  William Tyler Watkins; Hamidreza Nourzadeh; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.