| Literature DB >> 21776353 |
Mónica V Cunha1, Madalena Monteiro, Paulo Carvalho, Paula Mendonça, Teresa Albuquerque, Ana Botelho.
Abstract
This paper describes the current situation of animal tuberculosis in Portugal, reviewing the accomplishments and constraints of the 2001-2009 period. Notwithstanding the substantial progress achieved with the implementation of a comprehensive test and cull scheme, notification, postmortem inspection and surveillance at slaughterhouses, herd and animal prevalence have unexpectedly increased in 2009. In parallel, the recent awareness of tuberculosis in local free-ranging wildlife species causes concern regarding the final steps towards eradication, demanding new approaches to the existing disease control policies.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21776353 PMCID: PMC3135245 DOI: 10.4061/2011/795165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Figure 1(a) Number of herds officially bTB free (white bars) and nonofficially bTB free (black bars) among the total number of herds (indicated by grey bars) in Portugal, for the period 2001–2009. Officially bTB free herds refer to herds that exclusively comprise animals exempt of disease symptoms and enclosing animals that yielded negative reactions to two consecutive official intradermal tests (applicable for cattle aged over 6 weeks). Source: [4]. (b) Number of reactor animals and reactor herds and animal/herd prevalence in Portugal for the period 2001–2009.
Patterns, animal host, and prevalence of the 21 most prevalent M. bovis and M. caprae spoligotypes isolated in mainland Portugal from 2002 to 2009 (joint results from [8, 15]). The patterns are listed in decreasing order of prevalence.
| Spoligotypes | Animal species | Number of isolates | Percentage of total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle | Goat | Sheep | Deer | Boar | |||
| SB0121 | 116 | 10 | 4 | 130 | 22.9 | ||
| SB0119 | 58 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 69 | 12.1 | |
| SB0140 | 29 | 2 | 31 | 5.5 | |||
| SB0886 | 28 | 28 | 4.9 | ||||
| SB1090 | 21 | 1 | 22 | 3.9 | |||
| SB1095 | 21 | 1 | 22 | 3.9 | |||
| SB0157 | 7 | 12 | 3 | 22 | 3.9 | ||
| SB0295 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 3.7 | ||
| SB1174 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 3.5 | ||
| SB1264 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 20 | 3.5 | ||
| SB0265 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 19 | 3.4 | |
| SB1172 | 16 | 2 | 18 | 3.2 | |||
| SB0120 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 18 | 3.2 | ||
| SB0124 | 16 | 16 | 2.8 | ||||
| SB0122 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 2.1 | |||
| SB0134 | 8 | 8 | 1.4 | ||||
| SB1195 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 1.4 | |||
| SB0856 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1.4 | ||
| SB1266 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1.2 | |||
| SB1273 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1.2 | |||
| SB1483 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1.1 | |||
| other | 44 | 9 | 3 | 56 | 9.8 | ||
Number of bTB suspect tissue samples received for histopathological analysis from cattle (n = 933) per year, category of slaughter, and presence or absence of bTB lesions per year as indicated by histopathology, for the period 2005–2009.
| Category of slaughter | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Total (no lesions) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | % | % | ||||||||
| Routine slaughter | 54 | 41 | 18 | 54 | 130 | 297 (127) | ||||||
| TB eradication program | 45 | 44 | 78 | 62 | 204 | 433 (188) | ||||||
| Information not available | 27 | 35 | 55 | 50 | 36 | 203 (99) | ||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
| Hystopathological results | No lesions | 68 | 68 | 56 | 74 | 148 | 414 | |||||
| TB lesions | 58 | 52 | 95 | 92 | 222 | 519 | ||||||
Number and percentage of bovine tissue samples (organs and lymph nodes) confirmed as bTB positive by histopathology. Results concerning the period 2005–2009 are presented per year and anatomical localization.
| Year | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Total (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | % | % | ||||||||
| Affected lymph nodes | head | 14 | 6 | 5 | 23 | 47 | 95 | |||||
| thoracic | 16 | 21 | 19 | 48 | 66 | 170 | ||||||
| abdominal | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | ||||||
| unknown | 21 | 13 | 62 | 13 | 80 | 189 | ||||||
| head and thoracic | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 23 | ||||||
| head and abdominal | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| thoracic and abdominal | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 14 | ||||||
| head, thoracic, and abdominal | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
| Other organs affected | lungs | 10 | 9 | 35 | 23 | 72 | 149 | |||||
| liver | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 21 | ||||||
Figure 2Typical macroscopic and microscopic lesions from bovine. Legend: (a) Lung and lymph node with extensive yellowish caseous necrosis; (b) Lymph node (100x)—a typical tuberculous granuloma with central necrosis, mineralization and multinucleated giant cells; (c) Lung (40x)—intrabronchial granuloma. Note the multinucleated giant cells. Arrow: bronchiolar epithelium; arrowhead: eroded bronchiolar epithelium; (d) Lymph node (100x)—microgranulomas with multinucleated giant cells and epithelioid cells.
Results of the histopathological analysis of tissue samples from wild boar (n = 153) and red deer (n = 356) per year for the period 2005–2009, indicating the number of samples presenting lesions in relation to their anatomical localization.
| Year | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boar | Deer | Boar | Deer | Boar | Deer | Boar | Deer | Boar | Deer | Boar | Deer | |
| Lesions | ||||||||||||
| Lung | 1 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 29 | 6 | 77 |
| Liver | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Spleen | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Lung + LMD | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| HLN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| LMD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| LMES | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 26 |
| LMD + LME | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| NIL | 0 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 40 | 17 | 43 | 31 | 93 | 63 |
| No lesions | ||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
Legend: LMD: mediastinal lymph nodes; LMES: mesenteric lymph nodes; HLN: head lymph nodes; NIL: nonidentified lymph nodes; Lung + LMD: lesions detected both in the lungs and in the mediastinal lymph nodes; LMD + LMES: lesions detected both in mediastinical and mesenteric lymph nodes.
Figure 3Typical lesions from deer and wild boar. Legend: macroscopic (a) and microscopic (b) images of red deer abscesses containing (a) a pale yellowish necrotic and purulent material and (b) (100x) necrotic area surrounded by epithelioid cells and multinucleated giant cells (as indicated by arrow); (c) micrograph of deer lung (100x): note the diffuse infiltration by epithelioid cells, neutrophils and multinucleated giant cells; (d) (40x) micrograph of a lymph node from wild boar: note the granuloma with extensive necrosis and mineralization.