Henry Lerner1, Katherine Durlacher, Samuel Smith, Emily Hamilton. 1. From Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and PeriGen, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the head-to-body delivery interval in shoulder dystocia, persistent brachial plexus injury, and neonatal depression. METHODS: We compared the head-to-body delivery intervals in 127 cases of uncomplicated shoulder dystocia-identified using medical record coding and verified by chart review in a university--affiliated community hospital--with a series of 55 medical-legal cases of shoulder dystocia with persistent brachial plexus injury, 14 of which included neonatal depression. Neonatal depression was defined as the presence of any of the following: fetal demise, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, umbilical artery pH lower than 7.00, or 5-minute Apgar score of 5 or lower. RESULTS: In the uncomplicated shoulder dystocia group, the median head-to-body delivery interval was 1.0 minute (interquartile range 0.5-1.0). The median for neonates with persistent brachial plexus injury and no depression was 2.0 minutes (interquartile range 1.0-4.0). For those with both persistent brachial plexus injury and neonatal depression, the median was significantly longer at 5.3 minutes (interquartile range 3.9-13.3), P<.001. CONCLUSION: Neonates born with persistent brachial plexus injury and neonatal depression after shoulder dystocia had longer head-to-body delivery intervals than those with uncomplicated shoulder dystocia or shoulder dystocia with persistent brachial plexus injury without depression. By 4 minutes, all of the neonates with uncomplicated shoulder dystocia were born. Conversely, the majority of neonates with depression-57%-had head-to-body delivery intervals greater than 4 minutes. Such information offers guidance to clinicians caught between the admonition to apply only gentle force when utilizing maneuvers to accomplish a shoulder dystocia delivery and the countervailing need to achieve delivery within a critical time frame to prevent hypoxic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the head-to-body delivery interval in shoulder dystocia, persistent brachial plexus injury, and neonatal depression. METHODS: We compared the head-to-body delivery intervals in 127 cases of uncomplicated shoulder dystocia-identified using medical record coding and verified by chart review in a university--affiliated community hospital--with a series of 55 medical-legal cases of shoulder dystocia with persistent brachial plexus injury, 14 of which included neonatal depression. Neonatal depression was defined as the presence of any of the following: fetal demise, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, umbilical artery pH lower than 7.00, or 5-minute Apgar score of 5 or lower. RESULTS: In the uncomplicated shoulder dystocia group, the median head-to-body delivery interval was 1.0 minute (interquartile range 0.5-1.0). The median for neonates with persistent brachial plexus injury and no depression was 2.0 minutes (interquartile range 1.0-4.0). For those with both persistent brachial plexus injury and neonatal depression, the median was significantly longer at 5.3 minutes (interquartile range 3.9-13.3), P<.001. CONCLUSION: Neonates born with persistent brachial plexus injury and neonatal depression after shoulder dystocia had longer head-to-body delivery intervals than those with uncomplicated shoulder dystocia or shoulder dystocia with persistent brachial plexus injury without depression. By 4 minutes, all of the neonates with uncomplicated shoulder dystocia were born. Conversely, the majority of neonates with depression-57%-had head-to-body delivery intervals greater than 4 minutes. Such information offers guidance to clinicians caught between the admonition to apply only gentle force when utilizing maneuvers to accomplish a shoulder dystocia delivery and the countervailing need to achieve delivery within a critical time frame to prevent hypoxic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Janine E Spain; Heather A Frey; Methodius G Tuuli; Ryan Colvin; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 8.661