Literature DB >> 21774552

DEKOIS: demanding evaluation kits for objective in silico screening--a versatile tool for benchmarking docking programs and scoring functions.

Simon M Vogel1, Matthias R Bauer, Frank M Boeckler.   

Abstract

For widely applied in silico screening techniques success depends on the rational selection of an appropriate method. We herein present a fast, versatile, and robust method to construct demanding evaluation kits for objective in silico screening (DEKOIS). This automated process enables creating tailor-made decoy sets for any given sets of bioactives. It facilitates a target-dependent validation of docking algorithms and scoring functions helping to save time and resources. We have developed metrics for assessing and improving decoy set quality and employ them to investigate how decoy embedding affects docking. We demonstrate that screening performance is target-dependent and can be impaired by latent actives in the decoy set (LADS) or enhanced by poor decoy embedding. The presented method allows extending and complementing the collection of publicly available high quality decoy sets toward new target space. All present and future DEKOIS data sets will be made accessible at www.dekois.com.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21774552     DOI: 10.1021/ci2001549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  23 in total

1.  Pharmacophore-based screening and drug repurposing exemplified on glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitors.

Authors:  Luminita Crisan; Sorin Avram; Liliana Pacureanu
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Comparative modeling and benchmarking data sets for human histone deacetylases and sirtuin families.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Eyob Hailu Kebede; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  What in silico molecular docking can do for the 'bench-working biologists'.

Authors:  Marius Mihăşan
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Rocker: Open source, easy-to-use tool for AUC and enrichment calculations and ROC visualization.

Authors:  Sakari Lätti; Sanna Niinivehmas; Olli T Pentikäinen
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  David Xu; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Lithocholic acid is an endogenous inhibitor of MDM4 and MDM2.

Authors:  Simon M Vogel; Matthias R Bauer; Andreas C Joerger; Rainer Wilcken; Tobias Brandt; Dmitry B Veprintsev; Trevor J Rutherford; Alan R Fersht; Frank M Boeckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 8.  Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.098

9.  Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Human Chemokine Receptors and Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Terry-Elinor Reid; Song Wu; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Small-Molecule Intervention At The Dimerization Interface Of Survivin By Novel Rigidized Scaffolds.

Authors:  Tamer M Ibrahim; Christoph Ernst; Andreas Lange; Susanne Hennig; Frank M Boeckler
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.