PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the causes of the increase in the posterior tibial slope during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and to investigate whether its changes influenced the correction angle in frontal plane. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients (26 knees) treated with open-wedge HTO. They were divided into the following two groups. Group A consisted of the knees whose opening gaps were fixed using a spacer plate having the trapezoidal block with a 2° posterior slope. In Group B, anterior and posterior opening gaps were fixed separately. The posterior tibial slope and the hip-knee-ankle angle were measured based on CT data. The relationship between the correction rate in frontal plane and the changes of posterior tibial slope was investigated. RESULTS: Increase in the posterior tibial slope was 2.1 ± 2.5° in Group A and 0.2 ± 1.2° in Group B, which showed a statistical difference (P = 0.02). The difference between the hip-knee-ankle angles before and after operation was 5.2 ± 2.3° in Group A and 5.5 ± 2.5° in Group B. The correction rate was statistically correlated with the changes of posterior tibial slope (R = -0.55, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: To avoid increase in the posterior tibial slope, the trapezoidal block with a only 2° posterior slope in a spacer plate was not sufficient, and it was necessary to fix anterior and posterior gaps separately. The correction angle in frontal plane had a trade-off relationship with the changes in posterior tibial slope. Thus, we thought that increase in the posterior tibial slope might result in correction loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Retrospective comparative study, Level III.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the causes of the increase in the posterior tibial slope during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and to investigate whether its changes influenced the correction angle in frontal plane. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients (26 knees) treated with open-wedge HTO. They were divided into the following two groups. Group A consisted of the knees whose opening gaps were fixed using a spacer plate having the trapezoidal block with a 2° posterior slope. In Group B, anterior and posterior opening gaps were fixed separately. The posterior tibial slope and the hip-knee-ankle angle were measured based on CT data. The relationship between the correction rate in frontal plane and the changes of posterior tibial slope was investigated. RESULTS: Increase in the posterior tibial slope was 2.1 ± 2.5° in Group A and 0.2 ± 1.2° in Group B, which showed a statistical difference (P = 0.02). The difference between the hip-knee-ankle angles before and after operation was 5.2 ± 2.3° in Group A and 5.5 ± 2.5° in Group B. The correction rate was statistically correlated with the changes of posterior tibial slope (R = -0.55, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: To avoid increase in the posterior tibial slope, the trapezoidal block with a only 2° posterior slope in a spacer plate was not sufficient, and it was necessary to fix anterior and posterior gaps separately. The correction angle in frontal plane had a trade-off relationship with the changes in posterior tibial slope. Thus, we thought that increase in the posterior tibial slope might result in correction loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Retrospective comparative study, Level III.
Authors: Craig M Rodner; Douglas J Adams; Vilmaris Diaz-Doran; Janet P Tate; Stephen A Santangelo; Augustus D Mazzocca; Robert A Arciero Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-04-24 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Joon Ho Wang; Ji Hoon Bae; Hong Chul Lim; Won Yong Shon; Cheol Woong Kim; Jae Woo Cho Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Stefan Hinterwimmer; Knut Beitzel; Jochen Paul; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Martin Sauerschnig; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Andreas B Imhoff Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Piers J Yates; James D Calder; Geoff J Stranks; Kevin S Conn; Delia Peppercorn; Neil P Thomas Journal: Knee Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Dae Kyung Bae; Young Wan Ko; Sang Jun Kim; Jong Hun Baek; Sang Jun Song Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Mehmet Akif Altay; Cemil Ertürk; Nuray Altay; Ahmet Şükrü Mercan; Serkan Sipahioğlu; Ali Murat Kalender; Uğur Erdem Işıkan Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Yong Seuk Lee; Min Kyu Kim; Hae Won Byun; Sang Bum Kim; Jin Goo Kim Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Min Kyu Kim; Jeong Ku Ha; Dhong Won Lee; Sang Wook Nam; Jin Goo Kim; Yong Seuk Lee Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Henning Madry; Lars Goebel; Alexander Hoffmann; Klaus Dück; Torsten Gerich; Romain Seil; Thomas Tschernig; Dietrich Pape Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 4.342