Literature DB >> 21773728

Conceptual framework for standard economic evaluation of physical activity programs in primary prevention.

Silke B Wolfenstetter1.   

Abstract

Economic evaluations of primary prevention physical activity programs have gained importance because of scarce resources in health-care-systems. A concept for economic evaluation should be based on the efficacy of physical activity, the standard methods of economic evaluation and the aims of public health. Previous publications have examined only parts of these components and have not developed a comprehensive conceptual framework; it is the objective of this article to develop such a framework. The derived method should aid decision makers and staff members of intervention programs in reviewing and conducting an economic evaluation. A literature search of articles was done using six electronic databases. Referenced works for standard methods and more comprehensive approaches for evaluation of preventive programs were studied. The newly developed conceptual framework for economic evaluation includes: (1) the type of physical activity program; (2) features of a selected study population; (3) the outcome dimension comprising exercise efficacy, reach, recruitment, response rate, maintenance, compliance and adverse health effects plus the social impact; and (4) the cost dimension consisting of program development costs, program implementation costs including the implementation, recruitment, program, participants' time costs and savings resulting from the health effects of the intervention. Cost-effectiveness also depends on the methodology, such as the chosen perspective, data collection, valuation methods and discounting. If an intervention is not considered cost-effective, it is necessary to check each dimension to find possible failures in order to learn for future interventions. A more detailed economic evaluation is of utmost importance for improved comparability and transferability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21773728     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-011-0235-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  58 in total

Review 1.  The practice of discounting in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  D H Smith; H Gravelle
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. Recommendations from the panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine. Panel on cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  J E Siegel; G W Torrance; L B Russell; B R Luce; M C Weinstein; M R Gold
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Changes in physical activity and short-term changes in health care charges: a prospective cohort study of older adults.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; A Lauren Crain; Nicolaas P Pronk; Patrick J O'Connor; Michael V Maciosek
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice.

Authors:  David A Dzewaltowski; Russell E Glasgow; Lisa M Klesges; Paul A Estabrooks; Elizabeth Brock
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2004-10

6.  A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Greiner; Tom Weijnen; Martin Nieuwenhuizen; Siem Oppe; Xavier Badia; Jan Busschbach; Martin Buxton; Paul Dolan; Paul Kind; Paul Krabbe; Arto Ohinmaa; David Parkin; Montserat Roset; Harri Sintonen; Aki Tsuchiya; Frank de Charro
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2003-09

Review 7.  Transferability of economic evaluations: approaches and factors to consider when using results from one geographic area for another.

Authors:  Ron Goeree; Natasha Burke; Daria O'Reilly; Andrea Manca; Gord Blackhouse; Jean-Eric Tarride
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 8.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski; B Gandek; N K Aaronson; G Apolone; P Bech; J Brazier; M Bullinger; S Kaasa; A Leplège; L Prieto; M Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Programme costing of a physical activity programme in primary prevention: should the costs of health asset assessment and participatory programme development count?

Authors:  Silke B Wolfenstetter; Bernd Schweikert; Jürgen John
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2012-03-25

2.  Research priorities for economic analyses of prevention: current issues and future directions.

Authors:  D Max Crowley; Laura Griner Hill; Margaret R Kuklinski; Damon E Jones
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2014-12

3.  Costing of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Silke B Wolfenstetter; Christina M Wenig
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2011-10-26

4.  Toward the economic evaluation of participatory approaches in health promotion: lessons from four German physical activity promotion projects.

Authors:  Peter C Gelius; Raluca M Sommer; Karim Abu-Omar; Valentin Schätzlein; Marc Suhrcke
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Evaluation of the role of Care Sport Connectors in connecting primary care, sport, and physical activity, and residents' participation in the Netherlands: study protocol for a longitudinal multiple case study design.

Authors:  E Smit; K E F Leenaars; M A E Wagemakers; G R M Molleman; M A Koelen; J van der Velden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Bristol girls dance project feasibility study: using a pilot economic evaluation to inform design of a full trial.

Authors:  Jane E Powell; Fran E Carroll; Simon J Sebire; Anne M Haase; Russell Jago
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Expert opinions on good practice in evaluation of health promotion and primary prevention measures related to children and adolescents in Germany.

Authors:  Katharina Korber; Christian Becker
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Cost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being and safety promotion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marja Hult; Olli Halminen; Miika Linna; Sakari Suominen; Mari Kangasniemi
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.367

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.