Literature DB >> 21772800

Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor Evoked Potential for the Facial Nerve Using a Cranial Peg-Screw Electrode and a "Threshold-level" Stimulation Method.

Tetsuya Goto1, Hisashi Muraoka, Kunihiko Kodama, Yosuke Hara, Takehiro Yako, Kazuhiro Hongo.   

Abstract

Transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) for the facial nerve (facial MEP) has been recognized as a good method for quantitative monitoring of facial nerve function in skull base surgery. To improve the feasibility and safety of facial MEP monitoring, a peg-screw electrode and a "threshold-level" method were investigated. From 2007 to 2009, intraoperative facial MEP monitoring with the peg-screw electrode and threshold-level method was successfully achieved in 26 of 29 patients who underwent surgery for the posterior fossa extra-axial tumor. The relationship between the change in the facial MEP threshold level and the postoperative function of the facial nerve was analyzed in 23 patients who had no facial palsy preoperatively. There were no complications associated with facial MEP monitoring. Nine patients who had stable facial MEP threshold had no facial palsy. Fourteen patients who had worsened but measurable facial MEP threshold had mild palsy at discharge. Two of three patients who had severely worsened and unmeasurable facial MEP threshold had severe facial palsy. The change in the facial MEP was well correlated with the postoperative facial function. The peg-screw electrode and threshold-level method are good options for facial MEP monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring; facial nerve; motor evoked potential; skull base

Year:  2010        PMID: 21772800      PMCID: PMC3134811          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1261270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  8 in total

1.  Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction.

Authors:  B Calancie; W Harris; G F Brindle; B A Green; H J Landy
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Transcranial electrical stimulation through screw electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials. Technical note.

Authors:  Katsushige Watanabe; Takashi Watanabe; Akio Takahashi; Nobuhito Saito; Masafumi Hirato; Tomio Sasaki
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery.

Authors:  Charles C J Dong; David B Macdonald; Ryojo Akagami; Brian Westerberg; Ahmed Alkhani; Imad Kanaan; Maher Hassounah
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Localized transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials for monitoring cranial nerves in cranial base surgery.

Authors:  Ryojo Akagami; Charles C J Dong; Brian D Westerberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Alarm criteria for motor-evoked potentials: what's wrong with the "presence-or-absence" approach?

Authors:  Blair Calancie; Maria R Molano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Facial nerve grading system.

Authors:  J W House; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Intraoperative facial motor evoked potentials monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation for preservation of facial nerve function in patients with large acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  Bai-yun Liu; Yong-ji Tian; Wen Liu; Shu-ling Liu; Hui Qiao; Jun-ting Zhang; Gui-jun Jia
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Facial nerve motor-evoked potential monitoring during skull base surgery predicts facial nerve outcome.

Authors:  M Fukuda; M Oishi; T Takao; A Saito; Y Fujii
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 10.154

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Different effects of tetanic stimulation of facial nerve and ulnar nerve on transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Shen Sun; Fu-Bo Tian; Shao-Qang Huang; Jun Zhang; Wei-Min Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

2.  Comparison of effectiveness between cork-screw and peg-screw electrodes for transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring using the finite element method.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tomio; Takenori Akiyama; Takayuki Ohira; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-11

3.  Thin-film electroencephalographic electrodes using multi-walled carbon nanotubes are effective for neurosurgery.

Authors:  Kousuke Awara; Ryuhei Kitai; Makoto Isozaki; Hiroyuki Neishi; Kenichiro Kikuta; Naoki Fushisato; Akira Kawamoto
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  Advances in Multidisciplinary Management of Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Tamara Ius; Alessandro Tel; Giuseppe Minniti; Teresa Somma; Domenico Solari; Michele Longhi; Pasquale De Bonis; Alba Scerrati; Mario Caccese; Valeria Barresi; Alba Fiorentino; Leonardo Gorgoglione; Giuseppe Lombardi; Massimo Robiony
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Prognostic value of transcranial facial nerve motor-evoked potentials in predicting facial nerve function following cerebellopontine angle tumorectomy.

Authors:  Hongmei Song; Chengyuan Ma; Dahai Xu; Mingxin Yu; Jiachun Feng; Lichao Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Bilateral and Optimistic Warning Paradigms Improve the Predictive Power of Intraoperative Facial Motor Evoked Potentials during Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery.

Authors:  Tobias Greve; Liang Wang; Sophie Katzendobler; Lucas L Geyer; Christian Schichor; Jörg Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelényi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.