Literature DB >> 14743930

Transcranial electrical stimulation through screw electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials. Technical note.

Katsushige Watanabe1, Takashi Watanabe, Akio Takahashi, Nobuhito Saito, Masafumi Hirato, Tomio Sasaki.   

Abstract

The feasibility of high-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) through screw electrodes placed in the skull was investigated for use in intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways in patients who are in a state of general anesthesia during cerebral and spinal operations. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited by TES with a train of five square-wave pulses (duration 400 microsec, intensity < or = 200 mA, frequency 500 Hz) delivered through metal screw electrodes placed in the outer table of the skull over the primary motor cortex in 42 patients. Myogenic MEPs to anodal stimulation were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. The mean threshold stimulation intensity was 48 +/- 17 mA for the APB muscles, and 112 +/- 35 mA for the TA muscles. The electrodes were firmly fixed at the site and were not dislodged by surgical manipulation throughout the operation. No adverse reactions attributable to the TES were observed. Passing current through the screw electrodes stimulates the motor cortex more effectively than conventional methods of TES. The method is safe and inexpensive, and it is convenient for intraoperative monitoring of motor pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14743930     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Different effects of tetanic stimulation of facial nerve and ulnar nerve on transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Shen Sun; Fu-Bo Tian; Shao-Qang Huang; Jun Zhang; Wei-Min Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Comparison of effectiveness between cork-screw and peg-screw electrodes for transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring using the finite element method.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tomio; Takenori Akiyama; Takayuki Ohira; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-11

4.  Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor Evoked Potential for the Facial Nerve Using a Cranial Peg-Screw Electrode and a "Threshold-level" Stimulation Method.

Authors:  Tetsuya Goto; Hisashi Muraoka; Kunihiko Kodama; Yosuke Hara; Takehiro Yako; Kazuhiro Hongo
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-11

5.  Successful surgical strategy for a cervical hemangioblastoma: Case report.

Authors:  Hideaki Imai; Kazuhiko Ishii; Hirotaka Chikuda; Junichi Ohya; Daichi Nakagawa; Tomomasa Kondo; Seiji Nomura; Masanori Yoshino; Satoru Miyawaki; Taichi Kin; Hirofumi Nakatomi; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 6.  A Neurophysiological Perspective on a Preventive Treatment against Schizophrenia Using Transcranial Electric Stimulation of the Corticothalamic Pathway.

Authors:  Didier Pinault
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-03-28

7.  Effects of electrodes length and insulation for transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tomio
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-06-19

8.  The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation.

Authors:  Hideaki Imai; Katsushige Watanabe; Takaaki Miyagishima; Yuhei Yoshimoto; Taichi Kin; Hirofumi Nakatomi; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans.

Authors:  Mihály Vöröslakos; Yuichi Takeuchi; Kitti Brinyiczki; Tamás Zombori; Azahara Oliva; Antonio Fernández-Ruiz; Gábor Kozák; Zsigmond Tamás Kincses; Béla Iványi; György Buzsáki; Antal Berényi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.