Literature DB >> 21771802

Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople.

Despina A Papamanou1, Nikolaos Gkantidis, Nikolaos Topouzelis, Panagiotis Christou.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyse the aesthetic evaluation of head photographs of treated individuals with clefts by laypeople and professionals and to investigate how certain cephalometric variables could be related to their rating. A set of five standardized head photos (frontal, both laterals, three-quater right and left) of 12 Caucasian patients with treated unilateral cleft lip and palate were presented to 12 adult laypeople, 12 orthodontists, and 12 maxillofacial surgeons. For each set of photos the judges had to answer four questions on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The answers were analysed for intra- and inter-panel level of agreement and correlations of assessments with certain cephalometric parameters were determined. There was a high level of agreement for all assessments of each panel of raters. However, laypeople were less satisfied with lip and nose aesthetics compared to professionals. The three groups were similarly satisfied with the aesthetics of the jaws and the face. The anterior position of the maxilla (SNA) influenced positively professionals' ratings of facial aesthetics. Orthodontists were negatively influenced when the vertical dimension of the face or the distance of the lower lip to E-plane were relatively increased. The latter was the only cephalometric parameter correlated with lower aesthetic scores obtained from laypeople. Professionals report greater satisfaction from the treatment outcome and evaluate cleft consequences with less severity than laypeople. According to cephalometric findings, the relative positions of the lips seem to dominate facial aesthetics' appreciation by laypeople, while specialists appear to focus on different features of the face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21771802     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

1.  Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs.

Authors:  Adam Stebel; Dries Desmedt; Ewald Bronkhorst; Mette A Kuijpers; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Aesthetic evaluation of the nasolabial region in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate comparing expert versus nonexperience health professionals.

Authors:  Tatiana Saito Paiva; Marcia Andre; Wellingson Silva Paiva; Beatriz Silva Camara Mattos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Influence of objective three-dimensional measures and movement images on surgeon treatment planning for lip revision surgery.

Authors:  Carroll-Ann Trotman; Ceib Phillips; Julian J Faraway; Terry Hartman; John A van Aalst
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2013-07-15

4.  Nasolabial symmetry and esthetics in cleft lip and palate: analysis of 3D facial images.

Authors:  Dries J Desmedt; Thomas J Maal; Mette A Kuijpers; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Psychosocial acceptance of cleft patients: has something changed?

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Karsten Winter; Dirk Halama; Christian Wirtz; Vedat Yildirim; Nattapong Sirintawat; Sirintawat Nattapong
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-28

6.  Clinicians and laypeople assessment of facial attractiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate treated with LeFort I surgery or late maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Eun Hee Chung; Ali Borzabadi-Farahani; Stephen L-K Yen
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Esthetic, Functional, and Everyday Life Assessment of Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Despina A Papamanou; Marina Karamolegkou; Domna Dorotheou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Do cleft lip and palate patients opt for secondary corrective surgery of upper lip and nose, frequently?

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Elefterios Vairaktaris; Christian Knipfer
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Structural outcomes in the Cleft Care UK study. Part 2: dento-facial outcomes.

Authors:  R Al-Ghatam; T E M Jones; A J Ireland; N E Atack; O Chawla; S Deacon; L Albery; A R M Cobb; J Cadogan; S Leary; A Waylen; A K Wills; B Richard; H Bella; A R Ness; J R Sandy
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Comparison of professional and laypeople evaluation of nasolabial esthetics following unilateral cleft lip repair.

Authors:  Adekunle Moses Adetayo; Modupe Olusola Adetayo; Oguntade Funmi A; Mayowa Solomon Somoye; Michael O Adeyemi; Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.