Literature DB >> 21767274

Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens.

Charlotte Menné Bonefeld1, Morten Milek Nielsen, Ingrid Maria Cecilia Rubin, Marie Torp Vennegaard, Sally Dabelsteen, Elena Gimenéz-Arnau, Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin, Carsten Geisler, Jeanne Duus Johansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perfumes are complex mixtures composed of many fragrance ingredients, many of which are known to be only weak allergens when tested individually. It is therefore surprising that fragrance contact allergy is one of the most common forms of contact allergy.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether mixing different fragrance allergens leads to increased sensitization potency, and to examine the difference in the challenge response to one chemical in mice sensitized either with the mixture of allergens or with only the relevant allergen.
METHODS: CBA mice were sensitized with three different concentrations of three fragrance allergens alone or as a mixture. The sensitization and elicitation responses were measured by ear thickness plus infiltration of B and T cells and T cell proliferation in the draining lymph nodes.
RESULTS: We found a dose-dependent sensitization response for each of the allergens. An increased response was seen when the allergens were mixed. A stronger challenge response to cinnamal was seen in mice sensitized with the allergen mixture than in mice sensitized with cinnamal alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that mixtures of allergens increase the primary response that potentiates the generation of memory T cells in response to the specific allergen. Thus, allergen mixtures enhance both induction and elicitation of contact allergy.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767274     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01945.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  9 in total

Review 1.  Adaptation in the innate immune system and heterologous innate immunity.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Pathomechanisms of Contact Sensitization.

Authors:  Philipp R Esser; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  [How common is fragrance allergy really?]

Authors:  J Geier; R Brans
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 4.  [Extended understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of contact allergy].

Authors:  Philipp R Esser; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Midline 1 controls polarization and migration of murine cytotoxic T cells.

Authors:  Lasse Boding; Ann K Hansen; Morten M Nielsen; Germana Meroni; Thomas H Braunstein; Anders Woetmann; Niels Ødum; Charlotte M Bonefeld; Carsten Geisler
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2015-01-27

Review 6.  Recent advances in understanding and managing contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin; Thomas Rustemeyer; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 7.  Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends.

Authors:  W Uter
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04

8.  Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products.

Authors:  A Panico; F Serio; F Bagordo; T Grassi; A Idolo; M DE Giorgi; M Guido; M Congedo; A DE Donno
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2019-03-29

9.  Harnessing co-operative immune augmentation by contact allergens to enhance the efficacy of viral vaccines.

Authors:  Louise S Cunningham; John P McFadden; David A Basketter; Felicity J Ferguson; Ian R White; Ian Kimber
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 6.419

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.