Literature DB >> 21767051

Perceptual and cognitive load interact to control the spatial focus of attention.

Karina J Linnell1, Serge Caparos.   

Abstract

Caparos and Linnell (2009, 2010) used a variable-separation flanker paradigm to show that (a) when cognitive load is low, increasing perceptual load causes spatial attention to focus and (b) when perceptual load is high, decreasing cognitive load causes spatial attention to focus. Here, we tested whether the effects of perceptual and cognitive load on spatial focus remain when, respectively, cognitive load is high and perceptual load is low. We found that decreasing cognitive load only causes spatial attention to focus when perceptual load is high and the stimulus encourages this. Moreover, and contrary to the widely held assumption that perceptual load focuses attention automatically (Lavie, Hirst, de Fockert, & Viding, 2004), perceptual load exerts its focusing effect only with the engagement of cognitive resources when cognitive load is low. In sum, perceptual and cognitive mechanisms exert interacting effects and operate in concert to focus spatial attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767051     DOI: 10.1037/a0024669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Relationships between trait impulsivity and cognitive control: the effect of attention switching on response inhibition and conflict resolution.

Authors:  Rotem Leshem
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-06

Review 2.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Psychopathy is associated with an exaggerated attention bottleneck: EEG and behavioral evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Scott Tillem; Hannah Weinstein; Arielle Baskin-Sommers
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Flexible attention system: Appearance time of split attention changes in accordance with the task difficulty level.

Authors:  Guangyao Zu; Hanbin Sang; Heng Zhou; Fan Zhang; Xiaogang Wu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Dynamics of auditory spatial attention gradients.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-09-05

6.  Domain-specific control of selective attention.

Authors:  Szu-Hung Lin; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cultural differences in performance on Eriksen's flanker task.

Authors:  Angela Gutchess; John Ksander; Peter R Millar; Berna A Uzundag; Robert Sekuler; Aysecan Boduroglu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Perceptual load and early selection: an effect of attentional engagement?

Authors:  Karina J Linnell; Serge Caparos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-02

9.  Salience of Somatosensory Stimulus Modulating External-to-Internal Orienting Attention.

Authors:  Jiaxin Peng; Sam C C Chan; Bolton K H Chau; Qiuhua Yu; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.