Literature DB >> 21767046

The sentence-composition effect: processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases.

Marcus L Johnson1, Matthew W Lowder, Peter C Gordon.   

Abstract

In 2 experiments, the authors used an eye tracking while reading methodology to examine how different configurations of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases (NPs) influenced the difference in processing difficulty between sentences containing object- and subject-extracted relative clauses. Results showed that processing difficulty was reduced when the head NP was unusual relative to the embedded NP, as manipulated by lexical frequency. When both NPs were common or both were unusual, results showed strong effects of both commonness and sentence structure, but no interaction. In contrast, when 1 NP was common and the other was unusual, results showed the critical interaction. These results provide evidence for a sentence-composition effect analogous to the list-composition effect that has been well documented in memory research, in which the pattern of recall for common versus unusual items is different, depending on whether items are studied in a pure or mixed list context. This work represents an important step in integrating the list-memory and sentence-processing literatures and provides additional support for the usefulness of studying complex sentence processing from the perspective of memory-based models.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767046     DOI: 10.1037/a0024333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  8 in total

1.  Effects of animacy and noun-phrase relatedness on the processing of complex sentences.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07

2.  Distinguishing lexical- versus discourse-level processing using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Joseph Hopfinger; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

3.  Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  It's hard to offend the college: effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

7.  Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

8.  Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control.

Authors:  Juliana Gerard; Jeffrey Lidz; Shalom Zuckerman; Manuela Pinto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.