Literature DB >> 21764556

Register-based data indicated nonparticipation bias in a health study among aging people.

Olli Nummela1, Tommi Sulander, Satu Helakorpi, Ilkka Haapola, Antti Uutela, Heikki Heinonen, Raisa Valve, Mikael Fogelholm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine nonparticipation in a survey by linking it with register information and identify potential nonresponse bias of inequalities in health status among aging people. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cross-sectional questionnaire survey with clinical checkups carried out in 2002 among persons born in 1926-1930, 1936-1940, and 1946-1950 in Southern Finland. The sample was linked with register information from Statistics Finland and analyzed in terms of participation and health status as measured by medicine reimbursements.
RESULTS: Participation in the survey was more frequent among those who were older, female, married or cohabiting, higher educated and nonurban residents, and those with higher income and moderate health. Among nonrespondents, women were less healthy than men, whereas among respondents, the results were reversed. Among nonrespondents, better income was associated with unfavorable health. Poor health was generally more common among nonrespondents than respondents in several subgroups.
CONCLUSION: Differences in response rates were found in sociodemographic factors, health, and socioeconomic position. Favorable health was generally more frequent among respondents than nonrespondents. In particular, health inequalities by gender and income differed between respondents and nonrespondents. Thus, nonresponse may lead to bias in analyses of health inequalities among aging people.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21764556     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  23 in total

1.  Non-response in surveys of very old people.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Matthias Kuppler; Christian Rietz; Roman Kaspar
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2018-09-03

2.  Responders versus nonresponders in a dementia study of the oldest old: the 90+ study.

Authors:  Annlia Paganini-Hill; Beverly Ducey; Marian Hawk
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Assessment of potential bias from non-participation in a dynamic clinical cohort of long-term childhood cancer survivors: results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rohit P Ojha; S Cristina Oancea; Kirsten K Ness; Jennifer Q Lanctot; D Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; James G Gurney
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Investigating Respondents and Nonrespondents of a Postal Breast Cancer Questionnaire Survey Regarding Differences in Age, Medical Conditions, and Therapy.

Authors:  Anna L Frobeen; Christoph Kowalski; Verena Weiß; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Exploring community pharmacists' experiences of surveying patients for drug utilization research purposes.

Authors:  Pia Frisk; Ulrika Bergman; Sofia Kälvemark-Sporrong
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-03-04

6.  Understanding Response Rates to Surveys About Family Members' Psychological Symptoms After Patients' Critical Illness.

Authors:  Ann C Long; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth Nielsen; Paul Ciechanowski; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Bi-factor analyses of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone.

Authors:  Brandon E Gavett; Paul K Crane; Kristen Dams-O'Connor
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  Data preparation techniques for a perinatal psychiatric study based on linked data.

Authors:  Fenglian Xu; Lisa Hilder; Marie-Paule Austin; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Second-stage non-response in the Swiss health survey: determinants and bias in outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Volken
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The older the better: are elderly study participants more non-representative? A cross-sectional analysis of clinical trial and observational study samples.

Authors:  Beatrice A Golomb; Virginia T Chan; Marcella A Evans; Sabrina Koperski; Halbert L White; Michael H Criqui
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.