Literature DB >> 28552830

Understanding Response Rates to Surveys About Family Members' Psychological Symptoms After Patients' Critical Illness.

Ann C Long1, Lois Downey2, Ruth A Engelberg2, Elizabeth Nielsen2, Paul Ciechanowski3, J Randall Curtis2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Achieving adequate response rates from family members of critically ill patients can be challenging, especially when assessing psychological symptoms.
OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with completion of surveys about psychological symptoms among family members of critically ill patients.
METHODS: Using data from a randomized trial of an intervention to improve communication between clinicians and families of critically ill patients, we examined patient-level and family-level predictors of the return of usable surveys at baseline, three months, and six months (n = 181, 171, and 155, respectively). Family-level predictors included baseline symptoms of psychological distress, decisional independence preference, and attachment style. We hypothesized that family with fewer symptoms of psychological distress, a preference for less decisional independence, and secure attachment style would be more likely to return questionnaires.
RESULTS: We identified several predictors of the return of usable questionnaires. Better self-assessed family member health status was associated with a higher likelihood and stronger agreement with a support-seeking attachment style with a lower likelihood, of obtaining usable baseline surveys. At three months, family-level predictors of return of usable surveys included having usable baseline surveys, status as the patient's legal next of kin, and stronger agreement with a secure attachment style. The only predictor of receipt of surveys at six months was the presence of usable surveys at three months.
CONCLUSION: We identified several predictors of the receipt of surveys assessing psychological symptoms in family of critically ill patients, including family member health status and attachment style. Using these characteristics to inform follow-up mailings and reminders may enhance response rates.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Response rate; critical illness; family centered; family member; nonresponse bias; psychological distress

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28552830      PMCID: PMC5523827          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  48 in total

1.  Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model.

Authors:  K Bartholomew; L M Horowitz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-08

2.  The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction.

Authors:  Daliana Peres Bota; Christian Melot; Flavio Lopes Ferreira; Vinh Nguyen Ba; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Critical care in the near future: patient-centered, beyond space and time boundaries.

Authors:  L Cabrini; G Landoni; M Antonelli; R Bellomo; S Colombo; A Negro; P Pelosi; A Zangrillo
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The interpersonal experience of health care through the eyes of patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Paul Ciechanowski; Wayne J Katon
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Quality of life after intensive care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sandra G Oeyen; Dominique M Vandijck; Dominique D Benoit; Lieven Annemans; Johan M Decruyenaere
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Effect of intensive care environment on family and patient satisfaction: a before-after study.

Authors:  Irene P Jongerden; Arjen J Slooter; Linda M Peelen; Hester Wessels; Colette M Ram; Jozef Kesecioglu; Margriet M Schneider; Diederik van Dijk
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  The "patient-centered" outcomes of critical care: what are they and how should they be used?

Authors:  J R Curtis
Journal:  New Horiz       Date:  1998-02

8.  Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9.

Authors:  Bernd Löwe; Jürgen Unützer; Christopher M Callahan; Anthony J Perkins; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Influence of patient attachment style on self-care and outcomes in diabetes.

Authors:  Paul Ciechanowski; Joan Russo; Wayne Katon; Michael Von Korff; Evette Ludman; Elizabeth Lin; Gregory Simon; Terry Bush
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Cardiac patients who completed a longitudinal psychosocial study had a different clinical and psychosocial baseline profile than patients who dropped out prematurely.

Authors:  Nikki L Damen; Henneke Versteeg; Patrick W Serruys; Robert-Jan M van Geuns; Ron T van Domburg; Susanne S Pedersen; Eric Boersma
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 7.804

View more
  5 in total

1.  Novel Risk Factors for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Family Members of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors.

Authors:  Robert Y Lee; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; Catherine L Hough; Erin K Kross
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Predictors of non-response to successive waves of surveys in the Japan Environment and Children's Study during the 3-year postpartum period: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Mika Kigawa; Akiko Tsuchida; Kenta Matsumura; Haruka Kasamatsu; Tomomi Tanaka; Kei Hamazaki; Yuichi Adachi; Hidekuni Inadera
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Factors of non-responsive or lost-to-follow-up Japanese mothers during the first year post partum following the Japan Environment and Children's Study: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Mika Kigawa; Akiko Tsuchida; Kenta Matsumura; Ayako Takamori; Mika Ito; Tomomi Tanaka; Kei Hamazaki; Yuichi Adachi; Shigeru Saito; Hideki Origasa; Hidekuni Inadera
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Patient and Family Experience in a Multidisciplinary Clinic for Children With Single-Ventricle Heart Disease.

Authors:  Kelly R Wolfe; Sarah L Kelly; Deborah R Liptzin; Dania Brigham; Carey Rafferty; Adel K Younoszai; Michael V Di Maria
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-03-02

5.  Psychological Attachment Orientation and Long-Term Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Among Family Members of ICU Patients.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Andrea K Knies; Jolanta Pach; Tara Kimbrough; Aida Martinez; Prerak Juthani; Stephanie Tu; Joan K Monin; Ana-Maria Vranceanu; David Y Hwang
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-08-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.