Thandi van Heyningen1, Landon Myer2, Michael Onah3, Mark Tomlinson4, Sally Field3, Simone Honikman3. 1. Perinatal Mental Health Project, Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: thandivh@gmail.com. 2. Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Perinatal Mental Health Project, Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 4. Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In low and middle-income countries (LMIC), common mental disorders affecting pregnant women receive low priority, despite their disabling effect on maternal functioning and negative impact on child health and development. We investigated the prevalence of risk factors for antenatal depression among women living in adversity in a low-resource, urban setting in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: The MINI Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI Plus) was used to measure the diagnostic prevalence of depression amongst women attending their first antenatal visit at a primary-level, community-based clinic. Demographic data were collected followed by administration of questionnaires to measure psychosocial risk. Analysis examined the association between diagnosis of depression and psychosocial risk variables, and logistic regression was used to investigate predictors for major depressive episode (MDE). RESULTS: Among 376 women participating, the mean age was 26 years. The MINI-defined prevalence of MDE was 22%, with 50% of depressed women also expressing suicidality. MDE diagnosis was significantly associated with multiple socioeconomic and psychosocial risk factors, including a history of depression or anxiety, food insecurity, experience of threatening life events and perceived support from family. LIMITATIONS: The use of self-report measures may have led to recall bias. Retrospective collection of clinical data limited our ability to examine some known risk factors for mental distress. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm the high prevalence of MDE among pregnant women in LMIC settings. Rates of depression may be increased in settings where women are exposed to multiple risks. These risk factors should be considered when planning maternal mental health interventions.
BACKGROUND: In low and middle-income countries (LMIC), common mental disorders affecting pregnant women receive low priority, despite their disabling effect on maternal functioning and negative impact on child health and development. We investigated the prevalence of risk factors for antenatal depression among women living in adversity in a low-resource, urban setting in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: The MINI Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI Plus) was used to measure the diagnostic prevalence of depression amongst women attending their first antenatal visit at a primary-level, community-based clinic. Demographic data were collected followed by administration of questionnaires to measure psychosocial risk. Analysis examined the association between diagnosis of depression and psychosocial risk variables, and logistic regression was used to investigate predictors for major depressive episode (MDE). RESULTS: Among 376 women participating, the mean age was 26 years. The MINI-defined prevalence of MDE was 22%, with 50% of depressed women also expressing suicidality. MDE diagnosis was significantly associated with multiple socioeconomic and psychosocial risk factors, including a history of depression or anxiety, food insecurity, experience of threatening life events and perceived support from family. LIMITATIONS: The use of self-report measures may have led to recall bias. Retrospective collection of clinical data limited our ability to examine some known risk factors for mental distress. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm the high prevalence of MDE among pregnant women in LMIC settings. Rates of depression may be increased in settings where women are exposed to multiple risks. These risk factors should be considered when planning maternal mental health interventions.
Authors: Jane Fisher; Meena Cabral de Mello; Vikram Patel; Atif Rahman; Thach Tran; Sara Holton; Wendy Holmes Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Mark Tomlinson; Mary J O'Connor; Ingrid M le Roux; Jacqueline Stewart; Nokwanele Mbewu; Jessica Harwood; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2014-06
Authors: Christina Psaros; Amelia M Stanton; Greer A Raggio; Nzwakie Mosery; Georgia R Goodman; Elsa S Briggs; Marcel Williams; David Bangsberg; Jenni Smit; Steven A Safren Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2022-03-08
Authors: Thandi van Heyningen; Simone Honikman; Landon Myer; Michael N Onah; Sally Field; Mark Tomlinson Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Anna Larsen; John Kinuthia; Harison Lagat; Joseph Sila; Felix Abuna; Pamela Kohler; Grace John-Stewart; Jillian Pintye Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: V N Mutiso; K Pike; C W Musyimi; T J Rebello; A Tele; I Gitonga; G Thornicroft; D M Ndetei Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 6.892