Literature DB >> 21763527

Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: the "residual vision activation theory".

Bernhard A Sabel1, Petra Henrich-Noack, Anton Fedorov, Carolin Gall.   

Abstract

Vision loss after retinal or cerebral visual injury (CVI) was long considered to be irreversible. However, there is considerable potential for vision restoration and recovery even in adulthood. Here, we propose the "residual vision activation theory" of how visual functions can be reactivated and restored. CVI is usually not complete, but some structures are typically spared by the damage. They include (i) areas of partial damage at the visual field border, (ii) "islands" of surviving tissue inside the blind field, (iii) extrastriate pathways unaffected by the damage, and (iv) downstream, higher-level neuronal networks. However, residual structures have a triple handicap to be fully functional: (i) fewer neurons, (ii) lack of sufficient attentional resources because of the dominant intact hemisphere caused by excitation/inhibition dysbalance, and (iii) disturbance in their temporal processing. Because of this resulting activation loss, residual structures are unable to contribute much to everyday vision, and their "non-use" further impairs synaptic strength. However, residual structures can be reactivated by engaging them in repetitive stimulation by different means: (i) visual experience, (ii) visual training, or (iii) noninvasive electrical brain current stimulation. These methods lead to strengthening of synaptic transmission and synchronization of partially damaged structures (within-systems plasticity) and downstream neuronal networks (network plasticity). Just as in normal perceptual learning, synaptic plasticity can improve vision and lead to vision restoration. This can be induced at any time after the lesion, at all ages and in all types of visual field impairments after retinal or brain damage (stroke, neurotrauma, glaucoma, amblyopia, age-related macular degeneration). If and to what extent vision restoration can be achieved is a function of the amount of residual tissue and its activation state. However, sustained improvements require repetitive stimulation which, depending on the method, may take days (noninvasive brain stimulation) or months (behavioral training). By becoming again engaged in everyday vision, (re)activation of areas of residual vision outlasts the stimulation period, thus contributing to lasting vision restoration and improvements in quality of life.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763527     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  37 in total

1.  Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation induces vision restoration in patients with visual pathway damage.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Andrea Antal; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Temporally coherent visual stimuli boost ocular dominance plasticity.

Authors:  Ulrike Matthies; Jenny Balog; Konrad Lehmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction.

Authors:  Francesca Verboschi; Daniela Domanico; Marcella Nebbioso; Giulia Corradetti; Sergio Zaccaria Scalinci; Enzo Maria Vingolo
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  Neuro-visual rehabilitation.

Authors:  Noa Raz; Netta Levin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Neuroprotective strategies for retinal disease.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Rachael S Allen
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Restoration of Opa1-long isoform inhibits retinal injury-induced neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Weili Xue; Zhiyin Song; Kun Huang; Ling Zheng
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Mental stress as consequence and cause of vision loss: the dawn of psychosomatic ophthalmology for preventive and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel; Jiaqi Wang; Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Muneeb Faiq; Christine Heim
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Souzana N Obretenova; Mary Lou Jackson; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-02-29

9.  Eye is the Window to the Brain Pathology.

Authors:  Varun Kumar
Journal:  Curr Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-15

10.  An Audiovisual 3D-Immersive Stimulation Program in Hemianopia Using a Connected Device.

Authors:  Monica Daibert-Nido; Yulia Pyatova; Kyle G Cheung; Arun Reginald; Eduardo Garcia-Giler; Eric Bouffet; Samuel N Markowitz; Michael Reber
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.