Literature DB >> 21763211

Early improvement in pain predicts pain response at endpoint in patients with fibromyalgia.

Fujun Wang1, Stephen J Ruberg, Paula J Gaynor, Alexandra N Heinloth, Lesley M Arnold.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: An unanswered, but clinically important question is whether there are early indicators that a patient might respond to duloxetine treatment for fibromyalgia pain. To address this question, pooled data from 4 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in duloxetine-treated patients (N = 797) with primary fibromyalgia as defined by the American College for Rheumatology were analyzed. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was used to determine what level of early pain improvement as measured by the 24-hour average pain severity question on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) best predicted later response. The predictor variables tested were 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% decrease in BPI 24-hour average pain from baseline to Week 1 and Week 2. The results of the CART analysis showed that for patients with ≥15% improvement in pain at Week 1 and ≥30% improvement at Week 2, the probability of response at 3 months was 75%. For patients with <15% improvement at both Week 1 and Week 2, the probability of not responding at 3 months was 86%. Quantifiable early improvement in pain during the first 2 weeks of treatment with duloxetine was highly predictive of response or nonresponse after 3 months of treatment. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents early indicators that can highly predict later pain response or nonresponse in fibromyalgia patients treated with duloxetine. The results may aid clinicians to predict the likelihood of response at 3 months within the first 2 weeks of treatment.
Copyright © 2011 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763211     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  8 in total

Review 1.  [General treatment principles, coordination of care and patient education in fibromyalgia syndrome : Updated guidelines 2017 and overview of systematic review articles].

Authors:  F Petzke; W Brückle; U Eidmann; P Heldmann; V Köllner; T Kühn; H Kühn-Becker; M Strunk-Richter; M Schiltenwolf; M Settan; M von Wachter; M Weigl; W Häuser
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review.

Authors:  Christopher Gottschalk; Dawn C Buse; Michael J Marmura; Bradley Torphy; Jelena M Pavlovic; Paula K Dumas; Nim Lalvani; Andrew Blumenfeld
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.430

Review 3.  Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Martin S Angst; Raymond Dionne; Roy Freeman; Per Hansson; Simon Haroutounian; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Nadine Attal; Ralf Baron; Joanna Brell; Shay Bujanover; Laurie B Burke; Daniel Carr; Amy S Chappell; Penney Cowan; Mila Etropolski; Roger B Fillingim; Jennifer S Gewandter; Nathaniel P Katz; Ernest A Kopecky; John D Markman; George Nomikos; Linda Porter; Bob A Rappaport; Andrew S C Rice; Joseph M Scavone; Joachim Scholz; Lee S Simon; Shannon M Smith; Jeffrey Tobias; Tina Tockarshewsky; Christine Veasley; Mark Versavel; Ajay D Wasan; Warren Wen; David Yarnitsky
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  Reduction in movement-evoked pain and fatigue during initial 30-minute transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment predicts transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation responders in women with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Carol G T Vance; M Bridget Zimmerman; Dana L Dailey; Barbara A Rakel; Katharine M Geasland; Ruth L Chimenti; Jon M Williams; Meenakshi Golchha; Leslie J Crofford; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Response to duloxetine in chronic low back pain: exploratory post hoc analysis of a Japanese Phase III randomized study.

Authors:  Toshinaga Tsuji; Naohiro Itoh; Mitsuhiro Ishida; Toshimitsu Ochiai; Shinichi Konno
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Response to duloxetine in patients with knee pain due to osteoarthritis: an exploratory post hoc analysis of a Japanese Phase III randomized study.

Authors:  Naohiro Itoh; Toshinaga Tsuji; Mitsuhiro Ishida; Toshimitsu Ochiai; Shinichi Konno; Yuji Uchio
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  High correlation of VAS pain scores after 2 and 6 weeks of treatment with VAS pain scores at 12 weeks in randomised controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: meta-analysis and implications.

Authors:  Andreas Karabis; Stavros Nikolakopoulos; Shaloo Pandhi; Katerina Papadimitropoulou; Richard Nixon; Ricardo L Chaves; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Duloxetine 60 mg for chronic low back pain: post hoc responder analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Levent Alev; Shinji Fujikoshi; Aki Yoshikawa; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Mitsuhiro Ishida; Toshinaga Tsuji; Kei Ogawa; Shinichi Konno
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.133

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.