Literature DB >> 21761868

Proton storage site in bacteriorhodopsin: new insights from quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations of microscopic pK(a) and infrared spectra.

Puja Goyal1, Nilanjan Ghosh, Prasad Phatak, Maike Clemens, Michael Gaus, Marcus Elstner, Qiang Cui.   

Abstract

Identifying the group that acts as the proton storage/loading site is a challenging but important problem for understanding the mechanism of proton pumping in biomolecular proton pumps, such as bacteriorhodopsin (bR) and cytochrome c oxidase. Recent experimental studies of bR propelled the idea that the proton storage/release group (PRG) in bR is not an amino acid but a water cluster embedded in the protein. We argue that this idea is at odds with our knowledge of protein electrostatics, since invoking the water cluster as the PRG would require the protein to raise the pK(a) of a hydronium by almost 11 pK(a) units, which is difficult considering known cases of pK(a) shifts in proteins. Our recent quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations suggested an alternative "intermolecular proton bond" model in which the stored proton is shared between two conserved Glu residues (194 and 204). Here we show that this model leads to microscopic pK(a) values consistent with available experimental data and the functional requirement of a PRG. Extensive QM/MM simulations also show that, independent of a number of technical issues, such as the influence of QM region size, starting X-ray structure, and nuclear quantum effects, the "intermolecular proton bond" model is qualitatively consistent with available spectroscopic data. Potential of mean force calculations show explicitly that the stored proton strongly prefers the pair of Glu residues over the water cluster. The results and analyses help highlight the importance of considering protein electrostatics and provide arguments for why the "intermolecular proton bond" model is likely applicable to the PRG in biomolecular proton pumps in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761868      PMCID: PMC3178665          DOI: 10.1021/ja201568s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  59 in total

Review 1.  What are the dielectric "constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Authors:  C N Schutz; A Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  A critical evaluation of different QM/MM frontier treatments with SCC-DFTB as the QM method.

Authors:  P H König; M Hoffmann; Th Frauenheim; Q Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  A thorough benchmark of density functional methods for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions.

Authors:  Lars Goerigk; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  Calculated proton uptake on anaerobic reduction of cytochrome C oxidase: is the reaction electroneutral?

Authors:  Yifan Song; Ekaterina Michonova-Alexova; M R Gunner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Functional waters in intraprotein proton transfer monitored by FTIR difference spectroscopy.

Authors:  Florian Garczarek; Klaus Gerwert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  pKa calculations in solution and proteins with QM/MM free energy perturbation simulations: a quantitative test of QM/MM protocols.

Authors:  Demian Riccardi; Patricia Schaefer; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Charges in the hydrophobic interior of proteins.

Authors:  Daniel G Isom; Carlos A Castañeda; Brian R Cannon; Priya D Velu; Bertrand García-Moreno E
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  How does a membrane protein achieve a vectorial proton transfer via water molecules?

Authors:  Steffen Wolf; Erik Freier; Klaus Gerwert
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Crystallographic structure of the K intermediate of bacteriorhodopsin: conservation of free energy after photoisomerization of the retinal.

Authors:  Brigitte Schobert; Jill Cupp-Vickery; Viktor Hornak; Steven Smith; Janos Lanyi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Microscopic pKa analysis of Glu286 in cytochrome c oxidase (Rhodobacter sphaeroides): toward a calibrated molecular model.

Authors:  Nilanjan Ghosh; Xavier Prat-Resina; M R Gunner; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  16 in total

1.  Density functional tight binding: values of semi-empirical methods in an ab initio era.

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  Benchmarking density functional tight binding models for barrier heights and reaction energetics of organic molecules.

Authors:  Maja Gruden; Ljubica Andjeklović; Akkarapattiakal Kuriappan Jissy; Stepan Stepanović; Matija Zlatar; Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  A delocalized proton-binding site within a membrane protein.

Authors:  Steffen Wolf; Erik Freier; Klaus Gerwert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Perspective: Quantum mechanical methods in biochemistry and biophysics.

Authors:  Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  A modified QM/MM Hamiltonian with the Self-Consistent-Charge Density-Functional-Tight-Binding Theory for highly charged QM regions.

Authors:  Guanhua Hou; Xiao Zhu; Marcus Elstner; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Formation of the Metal-Binding Core of the ZRT/IRT-like Protein (ZIP) Family Zinc Transporter.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Benchmark Study of the SCC-DFTB Approach for a Biomolecular Proton Channel.

Authors:  Ruibin Liang; Jessica M J Swanson; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Factors that differentiate the H-bond strengths of water near the Schiff bases in bacteriorhodopsin and Anabaena sensory rhodopsin.

Authors:  Keisuke Saito; Hideki Kandori; Hiroshi Ishikita
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  O to bR transition in bacteriorhodopsin occurs through a proton hole mechanism.

Authors:  Denis Maag; Thilo Mast; Marcus Elstner; Qiang Cui; Tomáš Kubař
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Molecular dynamics simulations reveal proton transfer pathways in cytochrome C-dependent nitric oxide reductase.

Authors:  Andrei V Pisliakov; Tomoya Hino; Yoshitsugu Shiro; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.