Literature DB >> 21761375

Stress-only or stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging in patients undergoing evaluation for bariatric surgery.

Anthony S Gemignani1, Stephan G Muhlebach, Brian G Abbott, G Dean Roye, David T Harrington, James A Arrighi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery for management of obesity is being used with increasing frequency. Stress testing with myocardial perfusion imaging is often employed as part of the workup prior to anticipated bariatric surgery. The incidence of clinically significant abnormalities on stress MPI performed for this indication, however, has not been established. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 383 consecutive stress MPI studies performed on patients undergoing workup prior to planned bariatric surgery. The study population had a mean age 42 ± 10 years, and was 83% female, with a body mass index of 49 ± 8. The majority of patients (81%) were able to exercise using either the Bruce or Modified Bruce protocol, and 67% underwent stress-only imaging. Overall SPECT MPI findings were normal in 89% and equivocal in 6% of patients. The incidence of abnormal findings on MPI was 5% (3% mild and 2% moderate-to-severe abnormalities). At 1 year, overall survival was 99.5%, with no difference between those with and without MPI abnormalities. Similarly, the incidence of post-operative cardiac events was very low (2%), and mostly due to atrial arrhythmias or borderline elevations of troponin.
CONCLUSION: In a typical pre-bariatric surgery population, the incidence of abnormal stress MPI is low. The majority of patients were able to use a stress-only strategy for assessment of perfusion. At 1 year the incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes is very low. Additional studies should be focused on determining whether any subgroup of such patients may benefit more from pre-operative stress testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761375     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9405-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  20 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The prognosis of a normal stress-only Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging study.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; Melanie N Wijetunga; Thomas M Klein; Louai Razzouk; Jim Godbold; Lori B Croft; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan.

Authors:  Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; David Share; Abdelkader Hawasli; Wayne J English; Jeffrey Genaw; Jonathan F Finks; Arthur M Carlin; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Barry I Graubard; David F Williamson; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Yoav Avidor; Eugene Braunwald; Michael D Jensen; Walter Pories; Kyle Fahrbach; Karen Schoelles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Umara Raza; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  H B Hubert; M Feinleib; P M McNamara; W P Castelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience.

Authors:  Peter W F Wilson; Ralph B D'Agostino; Lisa Sullivan; Helen Parise; William B Kannel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-09

10.  Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000.

Authors:  Earl S Ford; Umed A Ajani; Janet B Croft; Julia A Critchley; Darwin R Labarthe; Thomas E Kottke; Wayne H Giles; Simon Capewell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  15 in total

1.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Implementation of stress-only imaging: What will it take?

Authors:  John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging … it is time for a change!

Authors:  Sanjeev P Bhavnani; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Time to get on the stress-only bandwagon?

Authors:  Matthew W Parker; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Stress first myocardial perfusion imaging: is it time to put to rest the "rest first" strategy for most patients?

Authors:  Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Sabha Bhatti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Stress-only imaging: faster, cheaper, less radiation. So what's the hold up?

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; Lori B Croft; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review.

Authors:  B M Pampana Gowd; Gary V Heller; Matthew W Parker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Clinical value of supine and upright myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients using the D-SPECT camera.

Authors:  Simona Ben-Haim; Omar Almukhailed; Johanne Neill; Piotr Slomka; Rayjanah Allie; Dalia Shiti; Daniel S Berman; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Multiple opportunities to reduce radiation dose from myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.