Literature DB >> 21761214

Subjective and objective personal noise exposure and hypertension: an epidemiologic approach.

Tobias Weinmann1, Vera Ehrenstein, Rüdiger von Kries, Dennis Nowak, Katja Radon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evidence for an association between chronic noise exposure and hypertension has been observed in several studies but suffers from limitations like crude exposure assessment. In this analysis, an association between noise exposure and hypertension was investigated using personal noise dosimeters.
METHODS: Study population included 628 children (8-12 years of age), 632 adolescents (13-17 years of age) and 482 adults (18-65 years of age). Response was highest in children (61%) followed by adolescents (58%) and adults (40%). Noise exposure was assessed using personal dosimeter measurements over 24 h. In addition, subjective assessment of "positive" and "negative" experienced noise was recorded using a "noise diary". Estimates of association between noise and hypertension were obtained by logistic regression analysis, stratifying for age group and adjusting for sex.
RESULTS: A statistically significant association between night-time noise exposure and hypertension was observed in the group of adolescents and adults (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.04-2.13). Regarding subjective exposure, a non-significant trend was seen in this age group between negative noise annoyance during daytime and hypertension. For children, neither a statistically significant association between objective nor subjective exposure and hypertension could be observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Using objective personal measurements, an association between noise exposure, particularly during night-time, and hypertension could be detected among adolescents and adults. Differentiating between night-time and daytime exposure and considering subjective annoyance through presumably "positive" versus "negative" experienced noise can be important aspects in future studies. Moreover, dosimeter measurements over longer periods of time could be carried out to obtain an even better exposure assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761214     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-011-0679-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  24 in total

Review 1.  Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health.

Authors:  Stephen A Stansfeld; Mark P Matheson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Effects of environmental noise exposure on ambulatory blood pressure in young adults.

Authors:  Ta-Yuan Chang; Yu-An Lai; Hsiu-Hui Hsieh; Jim-Shoung Lai; Chiu-Shong Liu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Noise burden and the risk of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Stefan N Willich; Karl Wegscheider; Martina Stallmann; Thomas Keil
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Update on the 1987 Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Work noise annoyance and blood pressure: combined effects with stressful working conditions.

Authors:  P Lercher; J Hörtnagl; W W Kofler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Prevalence of Arterial Hypertension and Myocardial Infarction in Relation to Subjective Ratings of Traffic Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Goran Belojevic; Mica Saric-Tanaskovic
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Risk of hypertension from exposure to road traffic noise in a population-based sample.

Authors:  L Barregard; E Bonde; E Ohrström
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Epidemiology of hypertension.

Authors:  P K Whelton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Noise-induced annoyance and morbidity results from the pan-European LARES study.

Authors:  H Niemann; X Bonnefoy; M Braubach; K Hecht; C Maschke; C Rodrigues; N Röbbel
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports: the HYENA study.

Authors:  Lars Jarup; Wolfgang Babisch; Danny Houthuijs; Göran Pershagen; Klea Katsouyanni; Ennio Cadum; Marie-Louise Dudley; Pauline Savigny; Ingeburg Seiffert; Wim Swart; Oscar Breugelmans; Gösta Bluhm; Jenny Selander; Alexandros Haralabidis; Konstantina Dimakopoulou; Panayota Sourtzi; Manolis Velonakis; Federica Vigna-Taglianti
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Mark Brink; Abigail Bristow; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Lawrence Finegold; Jiyoung Hong; Sabine A Janssen; Ronny Klaeboe; Tony Leroux; Andreas Liebl; Toshihito Matsui; Dieter Schwela; Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

2.  Individual daytime noise exposure during routine activities and heart rate variability in adults: a repeated measures study.

Authors:  Ute Kraus; Alexandra Schneider; Susanne Breitner; Regina Hampel; Regina Rückerl; Mike Pitz; Uta Geruschkat; Petra Belcredi; Katja Radon; Annette Peters
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.