L Barregard1, E Bonde, E Ohrström. 1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 414, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. lars.barregard@amm.gu.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between hypertension and traffic noise. METHODS: The prevalence and incidence of hypertension were examined in a Swedish municipality partly affected by noise from a highway (20,000 vehicles/24 h) and a railway (200 trains/24 h). A-weighed 24 h average sound levels (L(Aeq,24h)) from road and railway traffic were calculated at each residential building using a geographical information system and a validated model. Physician-diagnosed hypertension, antihypertensive medication and background factors were evaluated in 1953 individuals using postal questionnaires (71% response rate). Prevalence ratios and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for different noise categories. Based on year of moving into the residence and year of diagnosis, person-years and incidence rates of hypertension were estimated, as well as relative risks including covariates, using Poisson and Cox regression. RESULTS: When road traffic noise, age, sex, heredity and body mass index were included in logistic regression models, and allowing for >10 years of latency, the OR for hypertension was 1.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.5) in the highest noise category (56-70 dBA) and 3.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 9.0) in men. The incidence rate ratio was increased in this group of men, and the relative risk of hypertension in a Poisson regression model was 2.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 6.2). There were no clear associations in women or for railway noise. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows a positive association between residential road traffic noise and hypertension among men, and an exposure-response relationship. While prevalence ratios were increased, findings were more pronounced when incidence was assessed.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between hypertension and traffic noise. METHODS: The prevalence and incidence of hypertension were examined in a Swedish municipality partly affected by noise from a highway (20,000 vehicles/24 h) and a railway (200 trains/24 h). A-weighed 24 h average sound levels (L(Aeq,24h)) from road and railway traffic were calculated at each residential building using a geographical information system and a validated model. Physician-diagnosed hypertension, antihypertensive medication and background factors were evaluated in 1953 individuals using postal questionnaires (71% response rate). Prevalence ratios and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for different noise categories. Based on year of moving into the residence and year of diagnosis, person-years and incidence rates of hypertension were estimated, as well as relative risks including covariates, using Poisson and Cox regression. RESULTS: When road traffic noise, age, sex, heredity and body mass index were included in logistic regression models, and allowing for >10 years of latency, the OR for hypertension was 1.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.5) in the highest noise category (56-70 dBA) and 3.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 9.0) in men. The incidence rate ratio was increased in this group of men, and the relative risk of hypertension in a Poisson regression model was 2.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 6.2). There were no clear associations in women or for railway noise. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows a positive association between residential road traffic noise and hypertension among men, and an exposure-response relationship. While prevalence ratios were increased, findings were more pronounced when incidence was assessed.
Authors: Theo Bodin; Jonas Björk; Kristoffer Mattisson; Matteo Bottai; Ralf Rittner; Per Gustavsson; Kristina Jakobsson; Per-Olof Östergren; Maria Albin Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Tobias Weinmann; Vera Ehrenstein; Rüdiger von Kries; Dennis Nowak; Katja Radon Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Guido Simonelli; Katherine A Dudley; Jia Weng; Linda C Gallo; Krista Perreira; Neomi A Shah; Carmela Alcantara; Phyllis C Zee; Alberto R Ramos; Maria M Llabre; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Rui Wang; Sanjay R Patel Journal: Sleep Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Elise van Kempen; Maribel Casas; Göran Pershagen; Maria Foraster Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Theo Bodin; Maria Albin; Jonas Ardö; Emilie Stroh; Per-Olof Ostergren; Jonas Björk Journal: Environ Health Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 5.984