Literature DB >> 2176087

Spinal nerve stimulation in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy.

C W Chang1, I N Lien.   

Abstract

Direct spinal nerve stimulation was compared with needle electromyography (EMG) in 40 patients who were suspected of having an L5 or S1 radiculopathy. For spinal nerve stimulation, we adapted a monopolar needle electrode inserted deep into the paraspinal muscle. The minimal latency, amplitude, and negative phase area of compound muscle action potential from myotomal muscles were recorded with computer assistance. Abnormality was considered to be significant when the value fell outside of 2 SD of control mean values. Among 17 patients with clinical evidence of radiculopathy, needle EMG was abnormal in 10 patients (58.8%), whereas in the nerve stimulation test the abnormalities were shown in 16 patients (94.1%); in amplitude difference and the abnormal area, differences were shown in 12 patients (70.6%). Among 23 patients with only subjective symptoms of radiculopathy, needle EMG was abnormal in nine patients (39.1%), whereas the abnormal amplitude differences were shown in 18 patients (78.3%) and 15 patients (65.2%) with abnormal area difference by spinal nerve stimulation, respectively. Direct spinal nerve stimulation is recognized as an objective and sensitive test in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2176087     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199012000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  2 in total

1.  Intraoperative electrophysiological studies to predict the efficacy of neurolysis after nerve injury-experiment in rats.

Authors:  Ji-Geng Yan; Mary P Eldridge; William W Dzwierzynski; Yu Hui Yan; Safwan Jaradeh; Lin-Ling Zhang; James R Sanger; Hani S Matloub
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2008-04-02

2.  Electrical stimulation of lumbar spinal nerve roots in dogs.

Authors:  Erkut Turan; Cengiz Unsal; Mehmet Utkan Oren; Omer Gurkan Dilek; Ismail Gokce Yildirim; Murat Sarierler
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 2.459

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.